10 Things You Need to Know About WordPress 2.6

Just when I think we’ve gotten the kinks worked out from converting to WordPress 2.5, Aaron Brazell tells me version 2.6 is about to come out! He’s written a handy dandy guide called 10 Things You Need to Know About WordPress 2.6 complete with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one. (Actually, below, what with Web pages not having backs.)

I’m not a developer, so a lot of the changes don’t have any obvious benefit to me. The Google Gears Support, Post Versioning and improved Press This bookmarklet functionality look like they would be useful to me. Post Versioning would be especially nice since I have on more than one occasion accidentally overwritten a post because I had multiple instances open.

Theoretically, I should stop editing posts in WordPress’ built-in editor and get used to using an external editor. I’ve never found one, though, that wasn’t more trouble than it was worth, requiring me to go into the WordPress editor and clean up bad coding.

FILED UNDER: Uncategorized, , , ,
James Joyner
About James Joyner
James Joyner is Professor and Department Head of Security Studies at Marine Corps University's Command and Staff College. He's a former Army officer and Desert Storm veteran. Views expressed here are his own. Follow James on Twitter @DrJJoyner.

Comments

  1. Bithead says:

    Theoretically, I should stop editing posts in WordPress’ built-in editor and get used to using an external editor. I’ve never found one, though, that wasn’t more trouble than it was worth, requiring me to go into the WordPress editor and clean up bad coding.

    Yeah, I’ve been using scribefire on and off with shall we say less than optimal results. Have you tried that one?

  2. James Joyner says:

    That’s the Firefox one? Yeah, I tried that briefly.

  3. vilmar says:

    As to the editor, I do all my editing using a tool called “w.bloggar” found here.

    Been using it for several years. Free. I basically use WP to help me wrap text around images.

    Everything else (links, quotes, fonts, colors, etc. etc.) I use w.bloggar.

    Try it out.

  4. McGehee says:

    Noobs. It ain’t proper HTML unless you code it as text, from the ground up, barefoot in the snow, uphill both ways.

  5. Ha @McGehee

    I’m a MarsEdit guy (Mac user FTW!) and it’s all straight HTML.

    James, everyone who uses Windows Live Writer likes it. They lost me at Windows though.

    Thanks for the link.

  6. James Joyner says:

    Aaron: I downloaded Windows Live Writer at home and work but never really made the transition. The problem is that I’m so used to WordPress functionality that the transition is difficult. I’ll try again to see how it handles tagging and whatnot.

  7. John Burgess says:

    James: I’m quite happy with the WP editor, as long as the WYSIWYG is turned off. There’s no coding that I need that isn’t covered by the plain vanilla buttons or, if necessary, a little HTML hard coding. And I mean very little.

    It’s far faster for me to just type the tags than to pull my hands off the keyboard to grab a mouse, but I do type quickly. I guess the fact that I know what’s in my CSS file makes a difference, too. And I’ll also note that my pages are very flat, with only the rare graphic, so I don’t have to mess around with positioning them. The ‘insert image’ function in WP 2.5 does seem to work well, though.

    I’ve yet to find a really helpful implementation of a WYSIWYG editor in any blog application.

    When I work off-line, I’ll use either MSWord, WordPad, TypePad, or Open Office Writer, typing in the tags, then cut-and-paste.

  8. Aaron: I downloaded Windows Live Writer at home and work but never really made the transition. The problem is that I’m so used to WordPress functionality that the transition is difficult. I’ll try again to see how it handles tagging and whatnot.

    I have had great success with Windows Live Writer (even though it’s a Microsoft Product – go figure!), especially because it’s a WYSIWYG editor. And it works fantastic with multiple blogs.

  9. Dyre42 says:

    “complete with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one.”

    You get five points for the “Alice’s Restaurant” reference. Now if you could only work in an “I Don’t Want a Pickle” reference…..

  10. James Joyner says:

    Now if you could only work in an “I Don’t Want a Pickle” reference…..

    I seldom post about motorcycles or short cops carrying large guns, unfortunately.

  11. James Joyner says:

    I’ve yet to find a really helpful implementation of a WYSIWYG editor in any blog application.

    I’ve generally eschewed WYSIWYG because it requires more clean-up effort than it saves. WordPress 2.5’s version, though, is promising. It allows easy toggling between views and it’s useful for certain applications. For example, if I’m quoting a paragraph from elsewhere that has bold or italicized text or embedded hyperlinks, the WYSIWYG cut-and-paste will save me substantial time.

    I use the markup buttons for link insertions, bold, and whatnot as well. I find that faster than typing in html.

  12. Michael says:

    Noobs. It ain’t proper HTML unless you code it as text, from the ground up, barefoot in the snow, uphill both ways.

    Real bloggers use Vi.

    (Mac user FTW!)

    My Linux box beats the coolness out of your Mac.

  13. Michael says:

    I’ve generally eschewed WYSIWYG because it requires more clean-up effort than it saves. WordPress 2.5’s version, though, is promising.

    Can you incorporate something like TinyMCE or FCKEditor into WordPress? I’ve never had an issue with the HTML those generate.

  14. Bithead says:

    There are plugins to allow TinyMCE to work, though if it’ll work in 2.6 seems an open question.

  15. James Joyner says:

    According to the Codex, “WordPress is bundled with the open source HTML WYSIWYG editor TinyMCE.”

    I’m surprised that they don’t make dual use of it for the commenting.