A Quick Thought on Media Coverage of Mitch Daniels Leaving the Race
·
Sunday, May 22, 2011
·
I’ve been reading quite a bit of commentary about Mitch Daniels deciding not to run for the Presidency and I admit to some surprise at something. There is an awful lot of weeping, moaning and gnashing of teeth at his departure, which makes no sense to me because he had zero chance of winning the Republican nomination. Zero. None. Nada. Zilch.
He doesn’t have the fundraising prowess or organization of Romney. He doesn’t have the base bona fides of Bachmann. And to top it all off, he’s about as exciting as getting a pair of black socks for Christmas.
Why anyone thought he had a chance is beyond me.
About Alex Knapp
Is Andrew Sullivan off of suicide watch yet?
Daniels wouldn’t be able to overcome being Dubya’s budget director during a time when the budget became a trainwreck.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
I don’t think fundraising would’ve been a problem given the people that were urging him to run.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
I think you are right about his chances.
I think the pining for Daniels was a reflection of the deep dissatisfaction that many party elites have for the current crop of candidates/direction of the party.
Romney is the flip-flopping retread whilst people like Palin and Bachmann are simply embarrassing. Seriously, what will someone like George Will (or even Charles Krauthammer) do if one of the more embarrassing candidates is nominated?
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Doesn’t have the fundraising prowess? Since last year his State-level PAC raised more cash than all the other potential candidates combined. And, as Doug said, with people like Haley Barbour willing to back him? I think he’d have been fine. Also, if “bona fides” are thinking, AFTER 9/11, that gay marriage is “probably the biggest issue that will impact our state and our nation in the last, at least, thirty years. I am not understating that” you can keep them. Bachmann is a moron.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
When a guy with no chance of winning is your best chance of winning, and he bails on you, there is bound to be some teeth gnashing.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
“Seriously, what will someone like George Will (or even Charles Krauthammer) do if one of the more embarrassing candidates is nominated?”
As to George Will, I don’t know because he may have some principles. Charles Krauthammer will climb aboard the Fox News Express and ride it to wherever it’s going at the moment, just like he does now.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
>Seriously, what will someone like George Will (or even Charles Krauthammer) do if one of the more embarrassing candidates is nominated?
Will has long found himself in situations like that. In 1992, he said he was refusing to vote for any of the three main candidates, and he wrote in Jack Kemp. In 2008, he didn’t say how or even whether he voted, but he basically admitted that Obama was more temperamentally fit for the office than McCain.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
Oh, sure: diss the black socks. Like white socks would be better.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0
My white socks look perfectly good with brown shoes. No one has told me otherwise.
Helpful or Unhelpful:
0 
0