Van Gogh Murderer Discourteous
 |
James Joyner | Tuesday, July 12, 2005 |
The London Daily Telegraph is apparently surprised that Mohammed Bouyeri, on trial for the murder of Dutch filmaker Theo van Gogh, is not a nice man.
Contempt and defiance from Muslim accused of murdering film-maker (Telegraph)
The gulf between the West and radical Islam was on painful display yesterday when a young Muslim went on trial for the murder of the Dutch film-maker Theo van Gogh but refused to recognise the court’s authority. Mohammed Bouyeri, a baby-faced 27-year-old with joint Moroccan and Dutch nationality, limped into court with what appeared to be a large Koran under one arm. Wearing a black, collarless gown and a black and white Palestinian-style headscarf, he smirked at the panel of three black-robed judges. He offered no defence, instructing his lawyer to tell the court that he acknowledged only Islamic law.
Bouyeri had refused to attend his trial, a right normally granted to defendants by Holland’s scrupulously liberal court system, but, in view of the impact of Mr van Gogh’s murder in November, he was forced to attend the hearing in a maximum security building in the Amsterdam suburb of Osdorp. Bouyeri displayed contempt for the judges, prosecutors, psychologists and police. He yawned, stroked his beard, prodded his face with a pen and played an imaginary piano on his thighs. Despite his bushy beard, Bouyeri appeared more like a sulky adolescent than a terrorist killer with links to Islamist cells in Germany, Madrid and beyond, portrayed by the prosecution.
Prosecutors said that Bouyeri shot Mr van Gogh on a busy Amsterdam street as the film-maker cycled to his office. Wounded, Mr van Gogh pleaded: “We can still talk about it! Don’t do it! Don’t do it.” The court was told that Bouyeri shot his victim six times then slit his throat with a kitchen knife, severing Mr van Gogh’s neck down to the backbone before impaling to his chest with the knife a five-page note threatening other public figures. Witness statements read in court described how he reloaded his gun then walked around a park before firing on a police vehicle, allegedly in an attempt to provoke a gunfight and die a martyr.
One would think the nature of the crime a much better illustration of “the gulf between the West and radical Islam” than a bit of smirking in court. While many mainstream press outlets can not bring itself to call those who murder civilians for political impact “terrorists,” they continue to be outraged when these murderers are defiant when put on trial by a system they obviously despise.
The mind boggles.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- Swap Blog linked with Van Gogh Killer
- Danny Carlton (aka Jack Lewis) linked with Around the Blogosphere
- Hyscience linked with On trial for film maker's slaying, Muslim extremist says: 'I would do it again' (Updated)
Why does this story remind me of Bob Dylan's line, "You can believe what you want to, Abe, but . . ."?
Well, I suggest we go along with his Islamic law and behead him on Amsterdam's main square.
Comments are Closed
