<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1ST AMENDMENT ROUNDUP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/1st_amendment_roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/1st_amendment_roundup/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:36:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/1st_amendment_roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-9141</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4186#comment-9141</guid>
		<description>I suppose &quot;judicial inactivism&quot; might be a more apt description. But the idea is the same: judges consitutionalizing their own political preferences in defiance of what the Constitution actually says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose "judicial inactivism" might be a more apt description. But the idea is the same: judges consitutionalizing their own political preferences in defiance of what the Constitution actually says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overtaken by Events</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/1st_amendment_roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-9142</link>
		<dc:creator>Overtaken by Events</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4186#comment-9142</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Here&#039;s a Shocker&lt;/strong&gt;
I think I mentioned yesterday that you&#039;d be seeing this. One question, though. If this were a decision that went...

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Here's a Shocker</strong><br />
I think I mentioned yesterday that you'd be seeing this. One question, though. If this were a decision that went...</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
