SARS VS. AIDS
 |
James Joyner | Thursday, April 24, 2003 |
Drudge links this report that a “leading doctor” claims SARS could be more dangerous than AIDS. Well, considering that SARS is spread casually while AIDS requires exchange of bodily fluids, that’s not really surprising. The good news, I think, is that because SARS isn’t linked in the public mind to an organized political lobby, we’ll be able to quarantine those infected much more easily.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
Related Stories:
- None Found
Recent Stories:
- OTB Latenight - The Clash
- 100 Most Influential Slogans
- McCain Working for Dollars, Not Votes?
- Hillary Clinton Buys 2012 Website!!
- Conservatives for Obama II
- McCain Collects Social Security
- Heller Denied D.C. Gun Permit
- Caption Contest Winners
- Bob Barr Conference Call
- California to Ban Trans Fats, Needs Schwarzenegger Signature
Comments
Comments are Closed
