Hired Guns

James Joyner | Saturday, April 10, 2004

Phil Carter has an excellent piece in Slate summarizing the legal and practical problems of using civilian contractors as combatants. A key point:

The first set of problems arises from the legal status of contractors. Armed contractors—like the four men ambushed in Fallujah last week—fall into an international legal gray zone. They aren’t “noncombatants” (as unarmed contractors are) under the 4th Geneva Convention, because they carry weapons and act on behalf of the U.S. government. However, they’re also not “lawful combatants” under the 3rd Geneva Convention, because they don’t wear uniforms or answer to a military command hierarchy. These armed contractors don’t even fit the legal definition of mercenaries, because that definition requires that they work for a foreign government in a war zone, in which their own country isn’t part of the fight. Legally speaking, they actually fall into the same gray area as the unlawful combatants detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

There’s more at the Intel Dump.

• None Found

• Barack Obama, Natural Born U.S. Citizen
• Supreme Court Made Supreme Error in Child Rape Decision
• McCain and Obama as Leading Men
• Bush: Skipping Olympics an ‘Affront’ to China
• Al Qaeda in Iraq Defeated?
• Caption Contest Winners
• National Mall Disrepair
• 10 Taliban Kill Themselves in Botched Bombing
• Poll: Third of Clinton Voters to Stay Home
• Jesse Helms Dead at 86

Tags | Military Affairs

| | Permalink | Send TrackBack

• Backcountry Conservative linked with Weekend Briefing 4/11/04
• Backcountry Conservative linked with Weekend Briefing 4/11/04

Comments are Closed