U.S. Job Gains Strongest in Seven Months (Reuters)
New U.S. jobs soared at the sharpest rate in seven months in October, the government reported on Friday, helped by a surge in construction activity as hurricane-battered areas in the Southeast were rebuilt. A surprisingly strong 337,000 jobs were added to payrolls last month — twice the 169,000-job growth that Wall Street economists had forecast and the strongest since March when 353,000 jobs were created, the Labor Department said.
Still, the unemployment rate edged up to 5.5 percent from 5.4 percent in September, but that was because more people joined the search for employment, a potentially hopeful sign. Not only was October a strong month but the number of jobs created in the two prior months was revised up — to 139,000 in September instead of 96,000 and to 198,000 in August instead of 128,000.
But for 100,000-odd votes in Ohio, Bush could have suffered the ironic fate of his father: Losing an election on the basis of misperception of a weak economy during an actual boom. The signs are good for a huge economic expansion in the second term.
And, no, I’m not changing my tune on this: President Bush is affecting this only at the margins. But he sure got blamed for a bad economy that was largely out of his control; he might as well enjoy unjust praise for a good economy.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of
Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the
Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.
Follow James on
FriendFeed |
Twitter |
Digg
NOTE: My spam filter automatically deletes any TrackBacks that do not actually link and refer to this post. Those doing it manually should ensure they have linked the post before sending the TrackBack ping.
Comments are Closed
The power is out in a lot of cities that I don’t live in. Now, I understand why this is a big deal. On the other hand, it’s not THAT big a deal. Basically, it’s out. They know why it’s out. They’re working on it. Why do we need 9/11-style wall-to-wall coverage on this on every TV and radio station in the country?
More to the point, why must I miss the Simpsons re-run that I watch from 6-6:30 until the interesting part of Fox Special Report comes on? For this:
Reporter 1: Man, it’s sure dark here in New York at 6 in the evening when you’re underground and there’s no power.
Anchor: Wow! Is it dark?
Reporter: Yes. Very dark. And, it’s a little hot, too, because the air conditioning is out.
Anchor: Wow! Thanks Reporter 1! Let’s now turn to Reporter 2, live in Cleveland!
Reporter 2: Man, it’s sure dark here in Cleveland at 5 in the evening. We’re apparently having a total solar eclipse, plus the power’s out.
Anchor: Wow! Is it dark?
Reporter: Yes. Very dark. And, it’s a little hot, too, because the air conditioning is out. And the computers are out, too! Apparently, they all run on power.
Anchor: I did not know that!
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of
Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the
Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.
Follow James on
FriendFeed |
Twitter |
Digg
-
Joe Kelley's The Sake Of Argument linked with "Big News" Missed the Point
-
Internet Ronin linked with Cows with Guns
NOTE: My spam filter automatically deletes any TrackBacks that do not actually link and refer to this post. Those doing it manually should ensure they have linked the post before sending the TrackBack ping.
Comments are Closed