working

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

Comments on Blogs, Redux

Michelle Malkin, belatedly responding to Kevin Drum (see my response here) explains why she doesn’t enable comments on most of her posts. After providing some excerpts from Duncan “Atrios” Black’s comment section, she observes,

Dr. Black may believe his bottom-feeding commenters enhance his blog, but I think most fair-minded bloggers on either side of the aisle–particularly ones with such presitigious academic pedigrees as Dr. Black’s–would balk at encouraging such obscene vitriol on their sites.

Kevin Drum can pat himself and his fellow liberal bloggers on the back for their comments sections. But if the above is what passes for enhanced and enlightened dialogue, I’m proud to be guilty of what Drum derides as “tight message control.”

I call it garbage control. It’s a good thing.

Thankfully, my trolls are mostly just annoying and unable to spell.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

James, you are not a minority woman whose thought left the sacred plantation. She IS, and must be burn as a heretic.

Posted by BigFire | February 8, 2005 | 06:53 pm | Permalink
 

True 'nuff. Still, the comments sections on Dkos and Eschaton, and to a lesser extent Political Animal, get pretty bad. That's true of some righty sites, too (LGF most notably). It's mostly a function of sheer size, although the Left's clearly more angry at the moment.

Posted by James Joyner | February 8, 2005 | 06:59 pm | Permalink
 

Touchy, isn't she?

As for the left being angrier, it's hard to say unless the top conservative blogs open up comments, isn't it?

Posted by Kevin Drum | February 8, 2005 | 07:25 pm | Permalink
 

Touchy? We have good reasons to hate you Kev, but rarely express it in as ugly a way as Lenin, Stalin or Kos.

Posted by Ripper | February 8, 2005 | 07:44 pm | Permalink
 

It's pretty funny that Malkin uses comments on someone else's blogs to buttress her decision not to have comments. And might I add that there are trivial ways to control commenter quality. Just putting up the barrier of registration cuts away 99% of the chaff.

The whole post is much like Malkin's other arguments: irrelevant and immaterial to the actual point in contention and simply there as a platform bash the left.

Posted by Hal | February 8, 2005 | 07:47 pm | Permalink
 

She does have trackbacks, which allows you to "comment" on your own site and link back. I did this once and got left-wing hate comments on my trackback article pretty quickly.

Posted by Director Mitch | February 8, 2005 | 08:12 pm | Permalink
 

Maybe I can't spell, but my kids sure can.

Posted by King of Fools | February 8, 2005 | 08:56 pm | Permalink
 

Mitch, can you point me to the comment thread URL?

Thanks.

Posted by Hal | February 8, 2005 | 09:12 pm | Permalink
 

Jame,s you taik that bak!

Posted by David Harris | February 8, 2005 | 09:43 pm | Permalink
 

I'm not a top conservative blog, but my comments are open and you should see all the liberal rage on display.

Posted by Rob | February 8, 2005 | 09:57 pm | Permalink
 

Rob, I liked your own comment

"Of course, I’m betting none of you were over in Iraq acting as human shields... Is there anything more pathetic than anti-war liberals who lack the courage of their convictions?"

ROFL!

Posted by Hal | February 8, 2005 | 11:08 pm | Permalink
 

Malkin is a lightning rod. If I were as "controversial" (read: retarded) as her, I wouldn't enable comments, either.

Posted by jpe | February 9, 2005 | 12:26 am | Permalink
 

Oh yeah, and if she enabled comments, she'd have to rethink the strategy of claiming "the left does X!" based on random comments.

Posted by jpe | February 9, 2005 | 12:28 am | Permalink
 

Malkin opens up commenting once in a while. It very quickly descends into ugliness, so it really requires monitoring, and someone to pull the plug when it starts to get out of hand. Comment registration has been considered (I'm her technical consultant), but that would require an upgrade to MovableType 3.x or WordPress 1.5.

Posted by Mark J | February 9, 2005 | 01:20 am | Permalink
 

I don't consider a site without commenting enabled to be a blog. To me, it's just a website that uses blogging software. I don't comment that often, but when I want to, it's very irritating not to be able to. One sided conversations are as fun as high school lectures that don't allow hand-raising.

I don't sub to her blog. If she lectures about something that makes the rounds, I'll hear about it from real blogs.

Posted by Sherri | February 9, 2005 | 06:07 am | Permalink
 

Wouldn't this obviously be a matter of free choice? It certainly makes different sites different which is a good thing. I remeember when MM had comments enabled and many of them were at this level:

'If I were as “controversial” (read: retarded) '

And obviously what she points out is much worse. Enabling comments for that is just a waste of bandwidth.

Posted by Jack Tanner | February 9, 2005 | 08:47 am | Permalink
 

Well, I enjoy checking into Michelle Malkins's blog daily -- as I do Instapundit and OTB here -- if for no other reason than they tend to cover topics I am interested in. I can read the local commentary, access the links and read the sources, take what I like, and leave the rest. Cool.

As for MM's site being "simply there as a platform bash the left" -- there is so much to bash; especially when the barn in question persists in presenting its broad side.

Posted by Ralph | February 9, 2005 | 10:36 am | Permalink
 

My comments are more along the lines of "hey American pig, we will find you and cut your head off you Jew dog--Allah be willing"

Posted by Rusty | February 9, 2005 | 10:47 am | Permalink
 

Hey, what's wrong with my spelling?

Posted by Jim Henley | February 9, 2005 | 11:23 am | Permalink
 

Some time ago, I stopped reading letters to the editor in the papers I subscribe to. Too often, the letters to the editor section is nothing more than a freak show.

It is unsurprising that the larger blogs have an even more serious problem, particularly since they are in a position to do even less than most papers.

My own blog keeps comments open, but it's a little neighborhood blog that rarely attracts nutcases. I will know I have made it big when I have to turn off commenting.

Posted by Kent | February 9, 2005 | 12:37 pm | Permalink
 

I can't foresee the day when I have to turn off commenting.

I also can't foresee the day when I'll have to mow my lawn again, so the above may not be altogether reliable.

Posted by McGehee | February 9, 2005 | 02:17 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.