working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

Schwarzenegger Approves $150M Stem Cell Loan

Now that President Bush has vetoed it at the federal level, states are beginning to fund stem cell research on their own, with California and Illinois joining the fray yesterday.

A day after President Bush vetoed expanded federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Thursday authorized a $150 million loan to fund California’s stem cell institute, which has been stalled by lawsuits. Schwarzenegger, a Republican who has been trying to put distance between himself and the unpopular president as he seeks re-election this year, said the state cannot afford to wait to fund the critical science associated with stem cells. “I remain committed to advancing stem cell research in California, in the promise it holds for millions of our citizens who suffer from chronic diseases and injuries that could be helped as a result of stem cell research,” Schwarzenegger said in a letter to his finance director.

[...]

Elsewhere, Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, a Democrat, announced Thursday that he is diverting $5 million from the state budget for stem cell research, despite repeated objections from state legislators. “Investing in research that can save lives and prevent serious illnesses is more than a sound public health strategy, it’s our moral obligation,” he said. The money will come out of administrative funds already set aside for the state Department of Healthcare and Family Services, Blagojevich said.

This seems perfectly reasonable to me. The several states have different political cultures on these controversial issues and are, quite literally, serving as laboratories.

While I have little doubt that Schwarzenegger is seeking to distance himself from Bush on various issues–California hasn’t been a red state in years–one would think legitimate philosophical disagreement would be a perfectly satisfactory explanation for this move. Why must every issue, even on the state level, be framed vis-a-vis the president?

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

So let's see:

- California's hospitals are closing down and unable to service people who have illnesses and injuries that can be helped TODAY because there isn't enough money

- $150 million is available to "loan" money to fund research in an area that MIGHT bring benefits in the unforseen future, but nothing for sure.

Yeah, James, sounds real "reasonable" to me.

Posted by Director Mitch | July 21, 2006 | 10:16 am | Permalink
 

Why must every issue, even on the state level, be framed vis-a-vis the president?

Why? Because he's THE DECIDER. Bush has all but demanded that any disagreement with federal policy be framed as being for or against him personally - that's been his admin's policy since day 1.

Posted by legion | July 21, 2006 | 11:14 am | Permalink
 

What if Dr. Blalock had abandoned his research into Heart surgery because "it MIGHT bring benefits in the unforseen future, but nothing for sure".

Bush and his fans continue to build a bridge to the 19th century...

Posted by anjin-san | July 21, 2006 | 12:11 pm | Permalink
 

We must protect the sanctity of paralysis and disease.

Posted by Ryan | July 21, 2006 | 03:54 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.