President (Again) Names the Enemy
Jawa Report guest poster The All-Seeing Eye is relieved to see these words from President Bush today in response to this morning’s announcement of a foiled UK 9/11: “The recent arrests that our fellow citizens are now learning about are a stark reminder that this nation is at war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom, to hurt our nation.” A-SE observes, “May seem like a small thing, but this is the first time, so far as I’m aware, that Bush has ever identified our enemy by name. In my book, that’s a step forward.”
Actually, though, as commenters point out, this isn’t the first time. Indeed, I had a very similar reaction to a November 14, 2005 speech to American troops in Alaska which contained this passage: “Some call this evil Islamic radicalism; others, militant Jihadism; still others, Islamo-fascism. Whatever we choose to call this enemy, we must recognize that this ideology is very different from the tenets of the great religion of Islam.”
But I thought all the suspects were British – aren’t they all Anglicans? (/snark off)
I don’t understand your logic. I thought we are supposed to kill all them brown people, not just the fascist ones?
You say jihadist /
I say irhabist /
You say Islamo-fascist /
I say mufsidoon /
jihadist, irhabist, Islamo-fascist, mufsidoon /
let’s call the whole thing off . . .
Matt Yglesias is worth quoting in full on this one (tho, like everyone else, he can benefit from my added emphasis):
Police work joined with cooperative intel seems to have broken the Heathrow plot, no?
Islamofascists. Man, who knew that Ossama was a closet corporatist who is an ardent anti-communist!
Listen, Anderson, you liberal-types don’t seem to understand that you may disagree with Bush, but he is a strong leader because he STICKS WITH THE MESSAGE. People who “analyze” like this Iglesias fellow are merely engaging in partisan class warfare.
We have to remember that 9/11 changed the world. We no longer have any room for trying to make sense of the actual conditions on the ground. We need to use our military strength to send a message to whoever, that we’re not screwing around. Sure, it may not actually rid the world of the threat or make us any safer, but it will help us stick to the message so the Dummocrats dont get out of hand.
Let me add, if you don’t go after them where they train and equip, you will be doing ‘police work joined with cooperative intel’ for an eternity.
Yglesias’ quote clearly reveals his position, with the tired old lefty ‘hasn’t managed to kill or capture Osama or Zawahiri’.
However, many, many of their misguided followers are dead or captured. So what? We haven’t heard a peep out of Osama for a while. I guess he’s busy trying to stay alive…