Wesley Clark Signals 2008 Presidential Bid
It looks like Wesley Clark is running again for president.
Wesley Clark said Tuesday he wants to avoid waiting too late to make a decision on whether to run for president — a mistake he made in his failed 2004 bid. “I think it was clear that I got in too late last time,” the retired general and former NATO commander told The Associated Press in an interview.
Clark announced his bid for the Democratic presidential nomination in September 2003, just four months before the first votes were cast. He dropped out of the race the following February, with his only victory in 14 caucuses and primaries coming in Oklahoma.
Clark is considering running again, but he said the late start was one of the mistakes he learned from in his last attempt. “(There was) an inability to create a staff in a timely fashion,” Clark said. “I didn’t have a campaign manager until the end of November. I had no money. I had no strategy when I started. It was my only faith-based initiative…. It’s one of several mistakes that if I were to run that I would hope I wouldn’t repeat.”
Interestingly, the Democratic field looks to be shaping up as Hillary Clinton versus a bunch of folks who have run before an failed: Al Gore, John Kerry, John Edwards, Joe Biden, and now Clark. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that. Indeed, several recent presidents have gotten elected after having previously failed in primary (Bush the Elder and Reagan) or general election (Nixon) bids. Indeed, it will be even more difficult than usual for someone without name recognition to break through against that field.
This may be bad news for the Democrats, though, as none of these candidates are governors and only Gore is a former vice president. It has been a long time, indeed, since someone who was not from one of those groups got elected president. And Wes Clark is no Dwight Eisenhower.
via Paul Glastris
I just thought about that one point, from what I can recall, JFK was the last President to not have been VP or Governor before taking office.
Jeff,
Yep, that’s right. That’s 46 years and 12 elections ago!
04: Bush 43 – Sitting pres, TX Gov
00: Bush 43 – TX Gov
95: Clinton – Sitting pres, AR Gov
92: Clinton – AR Gov
88: Bush 41 – Sitting VP
84: Reagan – Sitting pres, CA Gov
80: Reagan – CA Gov
76: Carter – GA Gov
72: Nixon – Sitting pres, fmr VP
68: Nixon – fmr VP, failed ’60 nominee, failed CA Gov run
64: Johnson – sitting pres, fmr VP
60: Kennedy – sitting Sen.
56: Eisenhower – sitting pres
52: Eisenhower – retired 5-star general, war hero
48: Truman – sitting pres, fmr VP
44: FDR – sitting pres, NY gov
40: FDR – sitting pres, NY gov
36: FDR – sitting pres, NY gov
32: FDR – NY gov
Basically, two exceptions in over 70 years!
You can go all the way back to Grover Cleveland’s second term with only two more exceptions (Hoover and Harding).
28: Hoover – Sitting Cabinet Secretary
24: Coolidge – Sitting President, Former VP, Former MA gov
20: Harding – Sitting sen., former Ohio Lt Gov
16: Wilson – Sitting pres, former NJ gov
12: Wilson – Former NJ gov
08: Taft – Former Gov of Phillipines
04: TR – Sitting pres, former VP
00: McKinley – Sitting pres, former Ohio gov
96: McKinley – Sitting Ohio gov
92: Cleveland – Former pres, NY gov
88: Harrison – Sitting sen
88: Cleveland – Sitting NY gov
Gee, if the future is always like the past, then the odds are against a non-gov.
Unless (as we say in baseball) the non-governors are due.
Yes Wes Clark is better than Dwight Eisenhower. The man is solid! He in many ways is the best choice for President in both parties!