working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

WaPo Nails it on ISG

While agreement with the WaPo editorial board is usually immediate cause to question my assumptions, I nonetheless think they got it exactly right with yesterday’s essay with the subhead “The Iraq Study Group imagines a Middle East that doesn’t exist.”

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

In formal logic systems, if you start with a false premise, any statement is true. How convenient.

Posted by charles austin | December 11, 2006 | 10:24 am | Permalink
 

"The Iraq Study Group imagines a Middle East that doesn’t exist"

There is a lot of that going 'round these days, doncha think?

Posted by Tano | December 11, 2006 | 01:22 pm | Permalink
 

"In formal logic systems, if you start with a false premise, any statement is true."

Huh?
Someone needs a little work on thier understanding of logic.

Posted by Tano | December 11, 2006 | 01:32 pm | Permalink
 

Actually I found the editorial to be rather oversold. They basically seem to be in agreement with the military approaches, except for explicit timelines, though I read the report as having considerable flexibility there.

And their comments on the diplomacy are kinda strange. They denounce a focus on the Israeli-Pal question, but in the end advocate movement on that front. They seem to object to the notion that resolving that issue is some silver bullet for resolving Iraq, but in that they are erecting a strawman - ISG does not claim that resolving the Israeli-Pal question will solve Iraq - only that it is a necessary part of our overall approach to the region.

Their only serious objection seems to be on the question of whether engagement with Syria can be constructive. They claim, without much to back it up, that the Golan issue is really not that important to Syria - all Syria is interested in is Lebanon. But that doesnt seem to make much sense. No doubt Syria has interests it is pursuing in Lebanon, and it is not in our interest to do much other than oppose them there. But Golan is also a big concern- little Assad would be a hero for the ages if he could get that land back, and there is therefore plenty of room for working that angle.

The Bush administration seems terribly incompetent at global political chess-playing, and perhaps their self-knowledge of that plays into their reluctance to even make much of an attempt. The consequences of all that however, are serious, given that without masterful diplomacy, there remains few options for advancing out interests other than military ones. Sounds like WaPo is buying into this Bushian mindset by counseling that we shouldnt even try to see what we can accomplish in that area.

Posted by Tano | December 11, 2006 | 01:46 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.