<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006 Midterm Election Predictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:10:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-103086</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-103086</guid>
		<description>here is the definition;....The Brain Slug is a parasitic alien life-form, consisting of a clear, carbon-based gelatinous material. This wily being requires a host body to survive, as it has no brain of its own (unfortunately, one attached itself to Fry&#039;s brain and subsequently died of starvation). Once attached, the brain slug controls all of its host&#039;s thoughts, turning them into a zombie-like creature incapable of emotion or intelligent conversation. Perhaps you know someone who fits this description. If so, report them to the local authorities immediately! 
See?? report Missouri quickly!![lol]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here is the definition;....The Brain Slug is a parasitic alien life-form, consisting of a clear, carbon-based gelatinous material. This wily being requires a host body to survive, as it has no brain of its own (unfortunately, one attached itself to Fry's brain and subsequently died of starvation). Once attached, the brain slug controls all of its host's thoughts, turning them into a zombie-like creature incapable of emotion or intelligent conversation. Perhaps you know someone who fits this description. If so, report them to the local authorities immediately!<br />
See?? report Missouri quickly!![lol]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-103085</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-103085</guid>
		<description>jeff;*KC &amp; ST.louis are really just &quot;Futurama brain slugs&quot; on the state of Missouri*. [lol]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeff;*KC &amp; ST.louis are really just "Futurama brain slugs" on the state of Missouri*. [lol]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff b</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-103021</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-103021</guid>
		<description>hln: What a strange argument you seem to be making.  &quot;Only St. Louis or KC&quot;?  St. Louis and KC have 85% of the state&#039;s population!  The &quot;rest of the state&quot; is barely 1 million people.

Our system is one person, one vote; our system is not one acre, one vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hln: What a strange argument you seem to be making.  "Only St. Louis or KC"?  St. Louis and KC have 85% of the state's population!  The "rest of the state" is barely 1 million people.</p>
<p>Our system is one person, one vote; our system is not one acre, one vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hln</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-102976</link>
		<dc:creator>hln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 02:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-102976</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty confident Talent will pull through in Missouri.  Springfield is such a Republican stronghold; only St. Louis or KC would cause sway with the rest of the state really being rural/conservative.

McCaskill&#039;s from KC - don&#039;t know if that&#039;s in her favor or not.  The KC Star sure seemed to like to beat up on her in evaluating her as an Auditor.

Don&#039;t forget - she lost the governership to young Matt Blunt (a scant 35, I believe), whom she liked to attack as inexperienced in her ads.  She seemed like she should be a given, but that&#039;s not the way it went at all. She&#039;s continuing the attack campaign against Talent, and the attacks aren&#039;t strong.

My 2 cents.

hln</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm pretty confident Talent will pull through in Missouri.  Springfield is such a Republican stronghold; only St. Louis or KC would cause sway with the rest of the state really being rural/conservative.</p>
<p>McCaskill's from KC - don't know if that's in her favor or not.  The KC Star sure seemed to like to beat up on her in evaluating her as an Auditor.</p>
<p>Don't forget - she lost the governership to young Matt Blunt (a scant 35, I believe), whom she liked to attack as inexperienced in her ads.  She seemed like she should be a given, but that's not the way it went at all. She's continuing the attack campaign against Talent, and the attacks aren't strong.</p>
<p>My 2 cents.</p>
<p>hln</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanford Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-102970</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanford Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-102970</guid>
		<description>I merely believe the Republicans will maintain a majority in both houses.  However, I recommend voting against all incumbents for at least two election cycles to purge the insanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I merely believe the Republicans will maintain a majority in both houses.  However, I recommend voting against all incumbents for at least two election cycles to purge the insanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-102969</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 23:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-102969</guid>
		<description>Back to the actual post topic, I think JJ is being a little pessimistic.  It seems clear that the Dems will take the House, if polls mean anything, but I suspect they&#039;ll gain fewer than 20 seats.  And polls may *not* mean anything.  The Repubs are pulling out every trick in the book, as Josh Marshall tirelessly documents at his blog.

As for the Senate, I can&#039;t imagine the Dems taking MT VA MO *and* MD ... just can&#039;t see it.  All 4 of those could easily tip Repub.  I will cheerfully confess myself a dumbass if the Dems actually take the Senate; I think they get a few more seats but not the majority.

(The reverse, actually, of what I&#039;d like to see; Reid would be a more entertaining majority leader than Pelosi.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to the actual post topic, I think JJ is being a little pessimistic.  It seems clear that the Dems will take the House, if polls mean anything, but I suspect they'll gain fewer than 20 seats.  And polls may *not* mean anything.  The Repubs are pulling out every trick in the book, as Josh Marshall tirelessly documents at his blog.</p>
<p>As for the Senate, I can't imagine the Dems taking MT VA MO *and* MD ... just can't see it.  All 4 of those could easily tip Repub.  I will cheerfully confess myself a dumbass if the Dems actually take the Senate; I think they get a few more seats but not the majority.</p>
<p>(The reverse, actually, of what I'd like to see; Reid would be a more entertaining majority leader than Pelosi.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-102965</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 22:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-102965</guid>
		<description>Anderson--I haven&#039;t had FoxNews on this weekend, although I did catch the tail end of Matthews&#039; show and much of Meet the Press today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anderson--I haven't had FoxNews on this weekend, although I did catch the tail end of Matthews' show and much of Meet the Press today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-102963</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 21:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-102963</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the context of Tuesday&#039;s election is a fit time to revisit the alleged non-hackery of FoxNews?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/11/foxs-election-weekend-propaganda.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Greenwald&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;Fox News has &lt;strong&gt;re-arranged its programming schedule this weekend &lt;/strong&gt;-- why this weekend? -- in order to broadcast at &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;five different times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; a genuinely demented fear-mongering propaganda film entitled &quot;Obsession: The Threat of Radical Islam.&quot; The whole point of the film -- the only point -- is to show menacing footage of Muslims, accompanied by very scary music, and then assert, over and over, that they are devoted to killing all of us and that the threat they pose is exactly the same as the threat of Nazi Germany, except it&#039;s much, much worse.&lt;/blockquote&gt;More at Greenwald (&lt;em&gt;much&lt;/em&gt; more, of course; the man do run on).

I can&#039;t imagine, offhand, what the pro-Democrat version of this would be, but I&#039;m pretty sure that if CNN or MSNBC ran whatever-it-is *five* times on the weekend before the election, we would be hearing about it all over the Right side of the blogosphere.

FoxNews -- like Pravda, but with paid advertising!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the context of Tuesday's election is a fit time to revisit the alleged non-hackery of FoxNews?  <a href="http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/11/foxs-election-weekend-propaganda.html" rel="nofollow">Greenwald</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Fox News has <strong>re-arranged its programming schedule this weekend </strong>-- why this weekend? -- in order to broadcast at <strong><em>five different times</em></strong> a genuinely demented fear-mongering propaganda film entitled "Obsession: The Threat of Radical Islam." The whole point of the film -- the only point -- is to show menacing footage of Muslims, accompanied by very scary music, and then assert, over and over, that they are devoted to killing all of us and that the threat they pose is exactly the same as the threat of Nazi Germany, except it's much, much worse.</p></blockquote>
<p>More at Greenwald (<em>much</em> more, of course; the man do run on).</p>
<p>I can't imagine, offhand, what the pro-Democrat version of this would be, but I'm pretty sure that if CNN or MSNBC ran whatever-it-is *five* times on the weekend before the election, we would be hearing about it all over the Right side of the blogosphere.</p>
<p>FoxNews -- like Pravda, but with paid advertising!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-102960</link>
		<dc:creator>Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 21:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-102960</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Comment in violation of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/otb_site_policies/&quot; title=&quot;OTB Site Policies&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;site policies&lt;/a&gt; deleted.

Commenter banned.&lt;/em&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Comment in violation of <a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/otb_site_policies/" title="OTB Site Policies" rel="nofollow">site policies</a> deleted.</p>
<p>Commenter banned.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-102951</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-102951</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That Burns and Allen could possibly win despite a series of gaffes and a generally anti-Republican climate is a testament to the power of incumbency and people’s reluctance to change parties.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, if they lose, perhaps Burns and Allen can resurrect their old TV show....&quot;Say goodnight, Georgie.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That Burns and Allen could possibly win despite a series of gaffes and a generally anti-Republican climate is a testament to the power of incumbency and people&rsquo;s reluctance to change parties.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, if they lose, perhaps Burns and Allen can resurrect their old TV show...."Say goodnight, Georgie."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lily</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-102946</link>
		<dc:creator>lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-102946</guid>
		<description>I really can&#039;t imagine the mentality of someone who would vote for Allen if they had the chance to voe for Webb.  I guess some people per fer fool&#039;s gold to the real thing.

Tester is a great guy.  If he loses it will be because there are enough selfish irresponsible Republicans who want tax cuts while also demanding that the federal gravy train keep coming to their door to tip the election.  
\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really can't imagine the mentality of someone who would vote for Allen if they had the chance to voe for Webb.  I guess some people per fer fool's gold to the real thing.</p>
<p>Tester is a great guy.  If he loses it will be because there are enough selfish irresponsible Republicans who want tax cuts while also demanding that the federal gravy train keep coming to their door to tip the election.<br />
\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Ross @ Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-102942</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Ross @ Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-102942</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Unintended consequences: at stake on Tuesday...&lt;/strong&gt;

Did the Democrats truly consider the consequences of dismantling the Patriot Act... or preventing the NSA from wiretapping international telephone calls... or obstructing data-mining on phone-call records?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Unintended consequences: at stake on Tuesday...</strong></p>
<p>Did the Democrats truly consider the consequences of dismantling the Patriot Act... or preventing the NSA from wiretapping international telephone calls... or obstructing data-mining on phone-call records?...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006_midterm_election_predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-102941</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/2006_midterm_election_predictions/#comment-102941</guid>
		<description>&quot;For dark is the suede, that mows like a harvest&quot;..... [Mars attacks]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"For dark is the suede, that mows like a harvest"..... [Mars attacks]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
