<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Iraqi Army: A Year of Progress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/the_iraqi_army_a_year_of_progress_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/the_iraqi_army_a_year_of_progress_/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Quick</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/the_iraqi_army_a_year_of_progress_/#comment-109404</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Quick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/the_iraqi_army_a_year_of_progress_/#comment-109404</guid>
		<description>I think the bigger question is whether this Iraqi army will be capable of preventing Iraq from becoming a vassal state of Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the bigger question is whether this Iraqi army will be capable of preventing Iraq from becoming a vassal state of Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/the_iraqi_army_a_year_of_progress_/#comment-109349</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/the_iraqi_army_a_year_of_progress_/#comment-109349</guid>
		<description>Ah Triumph, you're missing the brilliance of Bush's new plan - In the vein of "set a thief to catch a thief", Bush is now empowering the militias to police themselves!

And with the completely-successful record of allowing US corporations to police themselves without undue gov't interference, this will also stimulate the Iraqi economy! He is truly the Winston Churchill of our times. 

Or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah Triumph, you're missing the brilliance of Bush's new plan - In the vein of "set a thief to catch a thief", Bush is now empowering the militias to police themselves!</p>
<p>And with the completely-successful record of allowing US corporations to police themselves without undue gov't interference, this will also stimulate the Iraqi economy! He is truly the Winston Churchill of our times. </p>
<p>Or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/the_iraqi_army_a_year_of_progress_/#comment-109348</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/the_iraqi_army_a_year_of_progress_/#comment-109348</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Having the Iraqis in charge of security is, obviously, our goal. Unless they actually manage to clamp down on armed militias running around killing and terrorizing people, though, I’m not sure that this is a meaningful metric.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You are making a false distinction here.  The "Iraqis in charge of security" ARE THE SAME AS "armed militias."

They are not going to "clamp down" on themselves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Having the Iraqis in charge of security is, obviously, our goal. Unless they actually manage to clamp down on armed militias running around killing and terrorizing people, though, I&rsquo;m not sure that this is a meaningful metric.</p></blockquote>
<p>You are making a false distinction here.  The "Iraqis in charge of security" ARE THE SAME AS "armed militias."</p>
<p>They are not going to "clamp down" on themselves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
