working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

Guerrilla War and Failed States

John Robb observes that, “One of the most confusing aspect of modern insurgency for the ‘experts’ is that nearly every guerrilla group worth observing is advancing on the objective of state failure rather than state replacement.” Contrary to the traditional Mao-Ho-Castro model, the goal is not takeover of the state but rather chaos.

I think that’s right. Don Snow noticed that trend in the 1990s in places like the Andean drug states and the horn of Africa. It seems to be the case now in parts of the Middle East.

Aside from possibly changing the definitions of “victory” and “civil war,” though, I’m not sure what this means. Other than a lot more bloodshed, of course.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

Well, to set yourself up, you have to remove what's there, first. THen only can you rush in to fill the vaccum.

Posted by Bithead | April 16, 2007 | 08:55 am | Permalink
 

Well, that assumes you _want_ to hold political power. If all you are is a criminal group (I'm thinking drug cartels in SoAm and Afghanistan), then the chaos of no effective central gov't just boosts your profits (no functioning law enforcement to work against), and once someone does move into the vacuum, you just buy them off or foment the same chaos as before...

Posted by legion | April 16, 2007 | 10:06 am | Permalink
 

As Robb continues in the linked post, it may actually be better for the insurgents if they weaken but don't eliminate the state. The state continues to be responsible for and provide services.

IMO the next step to take from Robb's observations is not merely redefining victory from the point of view of the insurgent but from our own. We're victorious so long as the state continues to exist and have reasonable strength. Corollary: the counter-insurgency never ends.

Posted by Dave Schuler | April 16, 2007 | 10:37 am | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

The 2008 Weblog Awards

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.