Super Evolution and Creationists
 |
Steve Verdon | Monday, November 12, 2007 |
Here is a humorous video about how creationists don’t merely believe in evolution, they believe in super-evolution.
Via Debunkers.
About the Author: Steve has a B.A. in Economics from the University of California, Los Angeles and attended graduate school at The George Washington University, leaving school shortly before staring work on his dissertation when his first child was born. He works in the energy industry and prior to that worked at the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the Division of Price Index and Number Research.
- Micro-evolution vs. Macro-evolution
- Politics and Evolution
- 10 Questions to Ask Your Biology Teacher
- Conservative Guilt by Association
- More Americans Believe in Devil than Darwin
- Ron Paul on Evolution: The Last Straw
- Caption Contest Winners
- Janet Jackson Nude Sunbathing Video
- BBC Discovers Flying Penguins
- Ron Paul Blogging
- Below The Beltway linked with Creationists And Super-Evolution
Sometimes a person is downright 'embarrassed' by their fellow "Christians". This is one of those times. I'm still shaking my head at their abject - I'll stop here because I'm likely to start using words I really don't want to use.
SJ Reidhead
The Pink Flamingo
First of all, the premise is wrong. Believing in something called Super Evolution (I'm an evangelical Christian and I've never heard of it) is not a widespread belief among Christians.
Secondly, there is no proof of evolution as "scientists" believe it to be. You can find no examples of active evolution today or in the fossil record. The way they try and do it is to take two fossils, and say that there “must” have been evolution to get from one to the other. Hardly even scientific.
Finally, Christians believe that God created the species. Simple statement. Also, in the picture above, God also created the humans that wrote those books and created all the knowledge to be learned in those books.
Secondly, there is no proof of evolution as "scientists" believe it to be. You can find no examples of active evolution today or in the fossil record. The way they try and do it is to take two fossils, and say that there “must” have been evolution to get from one to the other. Hardly even scientific.
You are a profoundly ignorant fool who knows nothing about science.
wow, "I" disagree with "you" and therefore I am an ignorant fool? Way to argue your point. You sound like a typical liberal. (I would call you an ignorant fool, but that would be redundant).
wow, "I" disagree with "you" and therefore I am an ignorant fool?
No, you are an ignorant fool because you have absolutely no concept about what evolution is, and yet feel compelled to try to educate those of us who do.
To set the record straight, we do see evolution directly in the fossil record, and we do see it occur today, in action, right before our very eyes. Not knowing this makes you ignorant, posting on the subject anyway makes you a fool.
One of the few times I agree with Michael and Andy. Christopher, we see evolution happening now, and we see evidence of it having happened in the past. The evidence is overwhelming.
And yes, whether you've heard of it or not, if you believe in a 6,000 year old earth and Noah's Ark then you must believe in super evolution--i.e. evolution at a rapid pace unheard of anywhere in the scientific data/community.
Comments are Closed
