2008 Prediction Games
 |
James Joyner | Monday, January 14, 2008 |
Michael Medved has a much-linked column assessing the Republican candidates’ chances of beating Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama in November based on some “trial heat” surveys. He figures Mitt Romney is the worst of the plausible nominees and John McCain the best.
Kevin Drum has found survey data which backs up his hunch that Hillary Clinton would be just as effective against John McCain as Barack Obama, her negatives notwithstanding.
Steven Taylor uses a George Will column to argue that any plausible Republican nominee is going to have an uphill fight to beat any plausible Democratic nominee.
Based on the existing evidence, I’d say they’re all right. But while making informed guesses about the future is what pundits do, it’s complete folly.
The fact of the matter is that hardly anyone is yet paying attention. People have pretty firm ideas about Hillary Clinton, because she’s been in the spotlight so long, and that’s true to a much lesser extent for McCain. Otherwise, all the candidates — and that includes 2004 VP nominee John Edwards — are virtual unknowns to anyone who isn’t a political junkie.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- 2008 Prediction Games
- Giuliani, McCain Closest to Voters
- Predicting the Nominees 2008 (Updated)
- Republican Voters Uninspired by Candidates
- McCain Adviser Loves Obama
- McCain’s Path to Victory
- Obama and McCain Winning Wikipedia Primary
- Obama Gets His Bounce
- Obama Hires Patti Solis Doyle
- Obama, McCain Prevail in Mississippi
- House Trades Freedom for Health Coverage, Senate’s Move
- Hasan a Muslim First, American Second?
- OTB Caption JamTM
- Taking “No” As Iran’s Answer
- Update on the Fort Hood Massacre
- OTB Latenight – Soft Cell
- Caption Contest Winners
- Breaking: Shootings at Fort Hood (Updated)
- Pentagon Expected To Ask For Supplementary War Funding. As Usual.
- Marking the Anniversary of the Embassy Seizure
As I've said before, Moynihan was wrong: now everybody has his or her own facts.
I agree that precise predictions are impossible to make, but there are a number of historical trends that would indicate that a Democratic victory is far more likely than a Republican one at this stage, yes?
Not that anything is certain, of course.
a Democratic victory is far more likely than a Republican one at this stage, yes?
As I said, that would be my analysis as well (although I've predicted McCain will pull off the win). I just think the campaign will change minds, as will intervening events.
I think this year favors the democrats, but I completely agree with James that campaigns can change minds, and even more so intervening events.
Right now there is a lot that can happen and some of those things could drastically change ideas for who a person is going to vote for in an election.
