<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 45 Killed in Insurgent Attacks &#8212; Mostly Insurgents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/45_killed_in_insurgent_attacks_--_mostly_insurgents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/45_killed_in_insurgent_attacks_--_mostly_insurgents/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:31:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Batman</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/45_killed_in_insurgent_attacks_--_mostly_insurgents/comment-page-1/#comment-39821</link>
		<dc:creator>Batman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9721#comment-39821</guid>
		<description>I have to rant a little - forgive me - Okay so of the 45 &quot;killed by insurgent attacks&quot; at least 24 of them were insurgents!!!!! (and we don&#039;t know about the other 21 talked about later - based on the usual ratio - if they weren&#039;t VBIEDS but Haji&#039;s with AK&#039;s then the insurgents made up the lions share of dead...)  This isn&#039;t just sloppy its disgusting.  I like the quote from the &quot;US Military&quot; (wonder how you quote over a million people - shouldn&#039;t it say - &quot;Coalition Spokesman&quot;)  who refered to the 24 as terrorists...though you know the reporter probably wanted to put terrorists in quotes...Whatever happened to headlines like - &quot;24 insurgents killed in attacks on coalition forces&quot; oh wait - THAT would be considered bias... when did these guys become &quot;insurgents&quot; anyway?  Last I checked wouldn&#039;t that require some sort of cohesive political structure behind it - as opposed to the motley crew of jihadists, baathist thugs, and plain old criminal gangs that make up the &quot;insurgency&quot; - a word that implies a certain legitimacy, unlike &quot;terrorist&quot;, or just plain &quot;criminal&quot; though terrorist&#039;s by definition have political or social goals - and by all standards of law - are also criminals. Insurgencies are similar to &quot;revolutionaries&quot; and imply a sort of civil war - something that is most certainly not going on in Iraq.  Those killing folks in Iraq are neither &quot;insurgents&quot; or &quot;revolutionaries&quot; by any stretch of the imagination - Anyway - just my two cents...

Sometimes words really DO matter...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to rant a little - forgive me - Okay so of the 45 "killed by insurgent attacks" at least 24 of them were insurgents!!!!! (and we don't know about the other 21 talked about later - based on the usual ratio - if they weren't VBIEDS but Haji's with AK's then the insurgents made up the lions share of dead...)  This isn't just sloppy its disgusting.  I like the quote from the "US Military" (wonder how you quote over a million people - shouldn't it say - "Coalition Spokesman")  who refered to the 24 as terrorists...though you know the reporter probably wanted to put terrorists in quotes...Whatever happened to headlines like - "24 insurgents killed in attacks on coalition forces" oh wait - THAT would be considered bias... when did these guys become "insurgents" anyway?  Last I checked wouldn't that require some sort of cohesive political structure behind it - as opposed to the motley crew of jihadists, baathist thugs, and plain old criminal gangs that make up the "insurgency" - a word that implies a certain legitimacy, unlike "terrorist", or just plain "criminal" though terrorist's by definition have political or social goals - and by all standards of law - are also criminals. Insurgencies are similar to "revolutionaries" and imply a sort of civil war - something that is most certainly not going on in Iraq.  Those killing folks in Iraq are neither "insurgents" or "revolutionaries" by any stretch of the imagination - Anyway - just my two cents...</p>
<p>Sometimes words really DO matter...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFire</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/45_killed_in_insurgent_attacks_--_mostly_insurgents/comment-page-1/#comment-39817</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9721#comment-39817</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how they can spin more negatively than this.  Next time we get a 25-0 dead terrorists count, they&#039;ll count that as 25 killed by the &#039;insurgents&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't see how they can spin more negatively than this.  Next time we get a 25-0 dead terrorists count, they'll count that as 25 killed by the 'insurgents'.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Goergens</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/45_killed_in_insurgent_attacks_--_mostly_insurgents/comment-page-1/#comment-39805</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Goergens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9721#comment-39805</guid>
		<description>At least they didn&#039;t replace &#039;terrorists&#039;s with &#039;militants&#039;.

Btw, some of the terrorists might have been my neighbors. A sizable number of European Muslims have  gone to Iraq, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least they didn't replace 'terrorists's with 'militants'.</p>
<p>Btw, some of the terrorists might have been my neighbors. A sizable number of European Muslims have  gone to Iraq, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
