<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4th AMENDMENT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/4th_amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/4th_amendment/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:52:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leroy</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/4th_amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-3103</link>
		<dc:creator>Leroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2442#comment-3103</guid>
		<description>I would be curious as how this was justified. Heck, despite court rulings to the contrary, traffic stops are patently a violation of the fourth amendment. This apparently goes way beyond that but it is probably to late to hope for any better when a conservative southern state such as Alabama allows such foolishness to go on. If, as according to the article cited, there was a problem with disturbances, then a police presence was justifiable, but a presence is a long ways away from &quot;blocked off exits to the parking lot and set[ting] up checkpoints.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be curious as how this was justified. Heck, despite court rulings to the contrary, traffic stops are patently a violation of the fourth amendment. This apparently goes way beyond that but it is probably to late to hope for any better when a conservative southern state such as Alabama allows such foolishness to go on. If, as according to the article cited, there was a problem with disturbances, then a police presence was justifiable, but a presence is a long ways away from "blocked off exits to the parking lot and set[ting] up checkpoints."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristopher</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/4th_amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-3104</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2442#comment-3104</guid>
		<description>The story is poorly written because it was based on a television account of what happened.  The facts are still fairly sketchy at this point.  What I&#039;m curious about is what crime resulted in the tickets?  For what were they cited?



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story is poorly written because it was based on a television account of what happened.  The facts are still fairly sketchy at this point.  What I'm curious about is what crime resulted in the tickets?  For what were they cited?</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
