working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

The Bush Nominations

We need to see Paul Wolfowitz’s nomination in light of other recent developments in international-relations bureaucracies. Remember that the Bush administration also recently tapped John Bolton for United Nations Ambassador. But, as the Los Angeles Times reported yesterday, Condi Rice “showed that she could charm the French and the Germans” during a European tour. Moreover:

Rice’s inner circle includes three veteran diplomats who have worked closely with her and are generally seen as pragmatic internationalists. They are Deputy Secretary Robert B. Zoellick, former U.S. trade representative; R. Nicholas Burns, recently the U.S. ambassador to NATO; and Philip D. Zelikow, a lawyer, diplomat and historian who was staff director of the Sept. 11 commission.

These men — and perhaps Zoellick in particular — are very well-respected in Europe.

So we find the controversial figures dispatched to global institutions and the amenable figures concentrated in the State Department. Naturally, our allies are bound to gravitate towards Foggy Bottom when major issues arise, which is more than likely what the Bush administration wants in the second term, when mending ties is supposed to be the priority. Meanwhile, Wolfowitz and Bolton can work on whipping their respective bodies into shape. In particular, they can ideally try to reform the organizations more to our liking.

It seems to me that these nominations fall in line with Bush’s general preference for “coalitions of the willing” as opposed to international institutions. His most trusted sidekick is tasked with strengthening alliances, while bulldogs are charged with shaking up inert bodies in the wake of the Oil-for-Food scandal.

 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

The thing that concerns me about Wolfowitz is that he doesn't understand the connection between global poverty and terrorism. I read about it here: http://thinkprogress.org/index.php?p=449

Posted by Tony D. | March 16, 2005 | 02:06 pm | Permalink
 

OMG, Tony. I would have thought that old chestnut had finally been put out to pasture. Osama bin Laden and others who whip up extremist hysteria are not poor.

It isn't poverty that causes terrorism, you noodnik. It's ignorance! And ignorance also causes things like believing poverty causes terrorism.

Posted by McGehee | March 16, 2005 | 03:26 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog
Atlantic Update Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.