Priscilla Owen Filibuster Ends 81-18
 |
James Joyner | Tuesday, May 24, 2005 |
After four years of stalling tactics, the Senate voted by an overwhelming 81-18 to end debate on Priscilla Owen, virtually assuring she will be confirmed to the 5th Circuit.
Senate Votes to End Filibuster on Judge (AP)
The Senate voted Tuesday to end years of delaying tactics that blocked the nomination of Priscilla Owen to a federal judgeship, the first fruit of a bipartisan agreement to break the logjam over President Bush’s judicial choices.
The vote was 81-18 with opponents of the Texas Supreme Court justice falling well short of the 60 needed to continue their filibuster. A vote to confirm Owen could come as early as Tuesday.
Owen, nominated to a seat on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, has been blocked four times by Democratic filibusters in the four years since Bush first nominated her early in his first term.
Astounding.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- Health Care Tradeoffs
- DC Statehood Violates Serious Principles
- Caption Contest Winners
- The Political Economy of the U.S. Mortgage Default Crisis
- The Democrats and the Shock Doctrine
- Obama and Europe
- Supreme Court to Decide on Obama Citizenship
- International Implications of the Drop in Oil Prices (Updated)
- Obama’s Bipartisan Cabinet
- More Votes Found - Franken Hurt
- The Buzz Blog linked with Outside The Beltway : Priscilla Owen Filibuster E
- JackLewis.net linked with Priscilla Owen: Cloture
- The Daily Brief: NOTICE: Spammers will be shot on sight! linked with The Birth Of The Fillibuster
- The Daily Brief: NOTICE: Spammers will be shot on sight! linked with The Birth Of The Filibuster
I would like to think that the deal has already been broken due to the failure of Senator Inouye to vote for cloture of debate on Owen as required in Part I, Paragraph A of the memorandum.
The AP got it backwards on the vote: opponents needed only 40 votes to defeat cloture and continue debate.
Correction, cloture needs 60 votes right? Hence opponents needed 41 votes to continue debate.
The deal is unenforceable anyway, but if it were enforceable, a breach would have to be material -- as long as the cloture vote succeeded, Inouye's absence would not be not material.
Unless Inouye was a signatory, he couldn't break the deal anyway.
(Back from catching up on details) Ah. Inouye is a signatory. Still, it shouldn't be any surprise that the Republicans who signed this thing wouldn't have the backbone to enforce its provisions.
Comments are Closed
