<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Priscilla Owen Filibuster Ends 81-18</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/_senate_votes_to_end_filibuster_on_judge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/_senate_votes_to_end_filibuster_on_judge/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:14:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Daily Brief:  NOTICE:  Spammers will be shot on sight! &#187; The Birth Of  The Filibuster</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/_senate_votes_to_end_filibuster_on_judge/comment-page-1/#comment-46949</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Brief:  NOTICE:  Spammers will be shot on sight! &#187; The Birth Of  The Filibuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 15:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10664#comment-46949</guid>
		<description>[...] bole over Owen for the past four years, when it finally came down to a vote to end debate, it passed by an overwhelming 81-18. 	Hat Tip: Todd Zywicki at Volokh                           [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bole over Owen for the past four years, when it finally came down to a vote to end debate, it passed by an overwhelming 81-18. 	Hat Tip: Todd Zywicki at Volokh        </p>
<p>           [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/_senate_votes_to_end_filibuster_on_judge/comment-page-1/#comment-46926</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 14:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10664#comment-46926</guid>
		<description>(Back from catching up on details) Ah. Inouye &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; a signatory. Still, it shouldn&#039;t be any surprise that the Republicans who signed this thing wouldn&#039;t have the backbone to enforce its provisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Back from catching up on details) Ah. Inouye <i>is</i> a signatory. Still, it shouldn't be any surprise that the Republicans who signed this thing wouldn't have the backbone to enforce its provisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Daily Brief:  NOTICE:  Spammers will be shot on sight! &#187; The Birth Of  The Fillibuster</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/_senate_votes_to_end_filibuster_on_judge/comment-page-1/#comment-46918</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Brief:  NOTICE:  Spammers will be shot on sight! &#187; The Birth Of  The Fillibuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 13:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10664#comment-46918</guid>
		<description>[...] bole over Owen for the past four years, when it finally came down to a vote to end debate, it passed by an overwhelming 81-18. 	Hat Tip: Todd Zywicki at Volokh                           [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bole over Owen for the past four years, when it finally came down to a vote to end debate, it passed by an overwhelming 81-18. 	Hat Tip: Todd Zywicki at Volokh        </p>
<p>           [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/_senate_votes_to_end_filibuster_on_judge/comment-page-1/#comment-46911</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 13:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10664#comment-46911</guid>
		<description>Unless Inouye was a signatory, he couldn&#039;t break the deal anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless Inouye was a signatory, he couldn't break the deal anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackLewis.net</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/_senate_votes_to_end_filibuster_on_judge/comment-page-1/#comment-46910</link>
		<dc:creator>JackLewis.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 13:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10664#comment-46910</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Priscilla Owen: Cloture&lt;/strong&gt;

If she&#039;s such an extremist, then why did 26 Democrat Senators for to end the filibuster? Doesn&#039;t that pretty much...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Priscilla Owen: Cloture</strong></p>
<p>If she's such an extremist, then why did 26 Democrat Senators for to end the filibuster? Doesn't that pretty much...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wavemaker</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/_senate_votes_to_end_filibuster_on_judge/comment-page-1/#comment-46884</link>
		<dc:creator>wavemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 02:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10664#comment-46884</guid>
		<description>The deal is unenforceable anyway, but if it were enforceable, a breach would have to be material -- as long as the cloture vote succeeded, Inouye&#039;s absence would not be not material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deal is unenforceable anyway, but if it were enforceable, a breach would have to be material -- as long as the cloture vote succeeded, Inouye's absence would not be not material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/_senate_votes_to_end_filibuster_on_judge/comment-page-1/#comment-46877</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 00:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10664#comment-46877</guid>
		<description>Correction, cloture needs 60 votes right? Hence opponents needed 41 votes to continue debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction, cloture needs 60 votes right? Hence opponents needed 41 votes to continue debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/_senate_votes_to_end_filibuster_on_judge/comment-page-1/#comment-46876</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 00:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10664#comment-46876</guid>
		<description>The AP got it backwards on the vote: opponents needed only 40 votes to defeat cloture and continue debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AP got it backwards on the vote: opponents needed only 40 votes to defeat cloture and continue debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael A</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/_senate_votes_to_end_filibuster_on_judge/comment-page-1/#comment-46839</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 20:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10664#comment-46839</guid>
		<description>I would like to think that the deal has already been broken due to the failure of Senator Inouye to vote for cloture of debate on Owen as required in  Part I, Paragraph A of the memorandum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to think that the deal has already been broken due to the failure of Senator Inouye to vote for cloture of debate on Owen as required in  Part I, Paragraph A of the memorandum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Buzz Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/_senate_votes_to_end_filibuster_on_judge/comment-page-1/#comment-46834</link>
		<dc:creator>The Buzz Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 19:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10664#comment-46834</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Outside The Beltway : Priscilla Owen Filibuster E&lt;/strong&gt;

It&#039;s funny to see all these Senators rush to be on the winning side. In my mind, this simply underscores how silly the &quot;Gang of 14&#039;s&quot; agreement will prove to be. Apply a little pressure and many Senators turn as limp as old lettuce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Outside The Beltway : Priscilla Owen Filibuster E</strong></p>
<p>It's funny to see all these Senators rush to be on the winning side. In my mind, this simply underscores how silly the "Gang of 14's" agreement will prove to be. Apply a little pressure and many Senators turn as limp as old lettuce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
