Comments on: A Senator Doing His Job

By: B Dubya

B Dubya — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:59:16 +0000

I guess the comparison between Senator Obama under the table with the Iraqis and Ted Kennedy's outright sedition with the Brezhnev era Soviets didn't fit the narrative, huh.
One being the role model for the other and all....

By: Orion

Orion — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:04:55 +0000

In the 1980s Democrats charged Reagan and GHW Bush with conspiring with Tehran to keep the US embassy hostages from being released until after Carter left office on flimsier evidence than this. At least we can prove this meeting between Obama and Zebari took place. The Democrat-controlled House held showcase hearings to decide if George Bush secretly traveled to Tehran to meet with Khoumeni when they KNEW Secret Service logs showed he was in Paris.

By: Shannon Covel

Shannon Covel — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:15:31 +0000

Obama spokesperson speaks:

In fact, Obama had told the Iraqis that they should not rush through a "Strategic Framework Agreement" governing the future of US forces until after President George W. Bush leaves office, she said.

Oh yea so that's a whole lot different then asking them why they won't. Telling them is so much better. Obama camp hits back at Iraq double-talk claim

By: Dave Schuler

Dave Schuler — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:33:31 +0000

Mr. Taheri did not publish his interview with the Iraqi FM. All he gave us is an op-ed in which he quotes the Iraqi FM and that's linked in the body of my post.

Pretty much my point. There's no “there” there.

By: sam

sam — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:05:44 +0000

Y'all still us a cite for the "interview". I don't see it in any of the above comments.

By: GeoffB

GeoffB — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 06:37:05 +0000

I don't think there's any question about Obama going to jail. The question is how die-hard anti-war Obama supporters might take the suggestion that Obama would rather see the troops leave later under his command than sooner under someone else's. It doesn't rise to the level of charges that the Reagan campaign got Iran to hold the hostages till after Carter lost, but there's still the implication that Obama would rather have an issue than an end to our Iraq war efforts. I think it's fair to question the source, and we'll see if there's really anything to this story. But if there is, the scoop won't be that Obama faces indictment. The scoop will be that a supposedly anti-war politician tried to prolong the war for his own political ends.

By: Patrick

Patrick — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:27:11 +0000

I would note Taheri's past record of accuracy problems and take any story with his byline with a large grain of salt.
Just offhand I can think of one story that had to be retracted: the "Iranian badges" story, where he wrote an article citing anonymous sources who claimed that Iranian government had introduced a bill requiring non-Muslims to wear identifying badges. No such bill was introduced before the Iranian parliament, and the National Post (the Canadian paper that published it) retracted the article.
I would also note his claim that Iranian UN ambassador Javad Zarif was one of the embassy hostage-takers in 1979; apparently Zarif was actually studying in the US at the time.

By: Carol in Oregon

Carol in Oregon — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:06:58 +0000

"No elected official has ever been indicted under the Logan Act..."
What good news. Perhaps we finally have SOMETHING Sen. Obama can successfully accomplish!

By: DBinSD

DBinSD — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:41:39 +0000

Yeah, I think you're confusing the issue here. We're not really talking about whether or not Obama stays out of jail. Granted, I don't think he'll be indicted, but a Dem presidential candidate who is noted for being extremely liberal and soft on defense doesn't need to see his name mentioned in the same paragraph as "violation of the Logan Act" all that often. And keep in mind, you're not really talking about something the entire country needs to be aware of in order for it to be damaging - swing a few thousand votes in a couple of states, and suddenly he goes from heir apparent to filling out the rest of his term as the junior senator from Illinois. Not that he's going to win regardless, you understand.

By: Patrick T. McGuire

Patrick T. McGuire — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:36:47 +0000

It’s going to take more than Amir Taheri’s quotation of the statements of the Iraqi foreign minister about what Sen. Barack Obama said when he was in Baghdad in July to have much impact on the senator’s presidential campaign

Wrong! In politics, perception is reality. Besides, this very blog posting gives the story further life to keep it going.

By: Cernig

Cernig — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:32:05 +0000

Amir Taheri? Really? LOL!

By: sam

sam — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:17:05 +0000

Yeah, well, it's the NY Post, and Amir Taheri is not the most unbiased of writers. I can't figure out from the story if Taheri himself conducted the interview, or if he's quoting someone else's interview. If the latter, then the story is unsourced. If the former, why he doesn't say "the Iraqi foreign minister told me"? I'll withhold judgement on the veracity of this story pending verification. If anybody knows who conducted the interview and where I can find the complete transcript, I'd be appreciative. Every relevant google hit on "Zebari Obama interview" leads back to the Post story.