<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acquitted Parolees Sent Back to Jail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:10:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/comment-page-1/#comment-120279</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/04/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/#comment-120279</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;parole is a privilege, not a right&lt;/em&gt;

Sure.  But it&#039;s essentially a right once granted. Revocation should come from violating its terms, not random whim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>parole is a privilege, not a right</em></p>
<p>Sure.  But it's essentially a right once granted. Revocation should come from violating its terms, not random whim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M1EK</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/comment-page-1/#comment-120278</link>
		<dc:creator>M1EK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/04/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/#comment-120278</guid>
		<description>I see little problem in this - the guy&#039;s sentence hasn&#039;t expired yet; and parole is a privilege, not a right. A privilege which a lot of people take for granted, of course, but still just a privilege - and, no, &#039;fair&#039;ness ought not enter into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see little problem in this - the guy's sentence hasn't expired yet; and parole is a privilege, not a right. A privilege which a lot of people take for granted, of course, but still just a privilege - and, no, 'fair'ness ought not enter into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/comment-page-1/#comment-120195</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 18:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/04/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/#comment-120195</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jimmy Lee Page is not a good man.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If putting Jimmy Page in prison is what it takes to prevent him making a fool of himself in an ill-conceived Led Zeppelin reunion, I&#039;m all for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jimmy Lee Page is not a good man.</p></blockquote>
<p>If putting Jimmy Page in prison is what it takes to prevent him making a fool of himself in an ill-conceived Led Zeppelin reunion, I'm all for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/comment-page-1/#comment-120191</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/04/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/#comment-120191</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I am curious though that these men were still on parole, if the convictions were revoked.&lt;/em&gt;

The conviction wasn&#039;t revoked for the 1975 crime.  His &lt;em&gt;parole&lt;/em&gt; was revoked because of an alleged 1987 crime of which he was acquitted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I am curious though that these men were still on parole, if the convictions were revoked.</em></p>
<p>The conviction wasn't revoked for the 1975 crime.  His <em>parole</em> was revoked because of an alleged 1987 crime of which he was acquitted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just me</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/comment-page-1/#comment-120190</link>
		<dc:creator>just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/04/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/#comment-120190</guid>
		<description>Parole revocation hearings have very loose due proccess, and they also have a lower standard of proof to revocate-more along the lines of preponderance of the evidence rather than reasonable doubt.

It wouldn&#039;t be that difficult to get revoked.

I am curious though that these men were still on parole, if the convictions were revoked.  I would think an overturning of the conviction would result in a severance with any further supervision in the community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parole revocation hearings have very loose due proccess, and they also have a lower standard of proof to revocate-more along the lines of preponderance of the evidence rather than reasonable doubt.</p>
<p>It wouldn't be that difficult to get revoked.</p>
<p>I am curious though that these men were still on parole, if the convictions were revoked.  I would think an overturning of the conviction would result in a severance with any further supervision in the community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  » OTB News</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/comment-page-1/#comment-136981</link>
		<dc:creator> » OTB News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/04/acquitted_parolees_sent_back_to_jail/#comment-136981</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Archives  December 2006 August 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006     [IMG Outside The Beltway &#124; OTB]  42 Free Speech Includes Offensive Jokes! Acquitted Parolees Sent Back to Jail Imus Charity Ranch Future in Doubt Chicago Is USOC’s Pick OTB Caption JamTM Mitt Romney’s Fundraising Breaux Not Running for Governor Mandatory Health Insurance in California ABC TV Looks at Saudi Arabia&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> Archives  December 2006 August 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006     [IMG Outside The Beltway | OTB]  42 Free Speech Includes Offensive Jokes! Acquitted Parolees Sent Back to Jail Imus Charity Ranch Future in Doubt Chicago Is USOC&rsquo;s Pick OTB Caption JamTM Mitt Romney&rsquo;s Fundraising Breaux Not Running for Governor Mandatory Health Insurance in California ABC TV Looks at Saudi Arabia<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
