http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/adidas_to_buy_reebok_/ Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:42:30 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/adidas_to_buy_reebok_/comment-page-1/#comment-53461 Director Mitch Wed, 03 Aug 2005 14:46:28 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11519#comment-53461 Adibok? Redidus? Adibok? Redidus?

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/adidas_to_buy_reebok_/comment-page-1/#comment-53451 Jim Henley Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:54:26 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11519#comment-53451 It's all about the <a href="http://www.vitruvianrunning.com" rel="nofollow">Vitruvians</a>, baby. If you run. It's all about the Vitruvians, baby. If you run.

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/adidas_to_buy_reebok_/comment-page-1/#comment-53443 Ralf Goergens Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:29:56 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11519#comment-53443 Adidas made the mistake back then to develop special shoes for every kind of sports, while Nike et al saw their product, quite rightly, as fashion items. With the lower costs of R&D they easily outcompeted Adidas, which now has to buy into the Amercan market to get soke serious share of it back. Adidas made the mistake back then to develop special shoes for every kind of sports, while Nike et al saw their product, quite rightly, as fashion items. With the lower costs of R&D they easily outcompeted Adidas, which now has to buy into the Amercan market to get soke serious share of it back.

]]>