<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Administration Careful in Talking about Classified Ops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:46:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/comment-page-1/#comment-82731</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 01:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/#comment-82731</guid>
		<description>We know you neocons want to replace the elected US govt. with a right-wing appointed corporate board, but that merger has not yet been finally approved by the shareholders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We know you neocons want to replace the elected US govt. with a right-wing appointed corporate board, but that merger has not yet been finally approved by the shareholders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/comment-page-1/#comment-82636</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/#comment-82636</guid>
		<description>Because we don&#039;t elect corporations, Mike. Nor do they have any responsibility to protect us. Nor are we obligated to fund their existence out of our salaries.

A corporation is answerable to its shareholders.
A government is answerable to its citizens.
These two groups are not equivalent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because we don't elect corporations, Mike. Nor do they have any responsibility to protect us. Nor are we obligated to fund their existence out of our salaries.</p>
<p>A corporation is answerable to its shareholders.<br />
A government is answerable to its citizens.<br />
These two groups are not equivalent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Thayer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/comment-page-1/#comment-82628</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Thayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 16:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/#comment-82628</guid>
		<description>So if this info is commercially available, why is it spying if the govenment does it?

The left just can&#039;t help showing how nutty they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if this info is commercially available, why is it spying if the govenment does it?</p>
<p>The left just can't help showing how nutty they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Singleton</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/comment-page-1/#comment-82617</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Singleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 15:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/#comment-82617</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Negroponte Had Denied Domestic Call Monitoring...&lt;/strong&gt;

Talk about MSM distortion. The NSA is not &quot;logging&quot; those calls, they are getting records from the telephone companies of telephone numbers called for a database....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Negroponte Had Denied Domestic Call Monitoring...</strong></p>
<p>Talk about MSM distortion. The NSA is not "logging" those calls, they are getting records from the telephone companies of telephone numbers called for a database....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/comment-page-1/#comment-82602</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 13:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/#comment-82602</guid>
		<description>Based on these two links, I&#039;d say that the latest NSA program is quite legal, well at least if they buy them, like everybody else.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-privacy05.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-privacy05.html&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.com/spy-on-them&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.democrats.com/spy-on-them&lt;/a&gt;

This issue is moot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on these two links, I'd say that the latest NSA program is quite legal, well at least if they buy them, like everybody else.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-privacy05.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-privacy05.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.democrats.com/spy-on-them" rel="nofollow">http://www.democrats.com/spy-on-them</a></p>
<p>This issue is moot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/comment-page-1/#comment-82589</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 13:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/administration_careful_in_talking_about_classified_ops/#comment-82589</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Memo to the NYT/IHT: Trying to detect unusual calling patterns is not &#8220;eavesdropping&#8221;...&lt;/strong&gt;

Our media continues to get it wrong on the topic of the NSA warrantless wiretaps/datamining program that was kicked into  high gear after the 9-11 attacks.  Check out the following  headline:
Bush Aide Defends Eavesdropping on Phone Calls 
Just as a re...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Memo to the NYT/IHT: Trying to detect unusual calling patterns is not &#8220;eavesdropping&#8221;...</strong></p>
<p>Our media continues to get it wrong on the topic of the NSA warrantless wiretaps/datamining program that was kicked into  high gear after the 9-11 attacks.  Check out the following  headline:<br />
Bush Aide Defends Eavesdropping on Phone Calls<br />
Just as a re...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
