Comments on: Senate Confirms Priscilla Owen for Federal Bench, 56-43

By: Dodd

Dodd — Thu, 26 May 2005 15:59:42 +0000

The Times is in error. I looked at the actual Roll Call vote; it was 55-43. For some reason, Stevens (R-AK) voted "Present."

By: PoliBlog: Politics is the Master Science

PoliBlog: Politics is the Master Science — Thu, 26 May 2005 15:34:25 +0000

On the Senate Compromise

There are a few key ways in which the discussion of the compromise over the President?s Appeals Court nominees misses the mark.

First: the critics on both side (and especially on the right) seem to think that it is logically legitimate to compare ...

By: JackLewis.net

JackLewis.net — Thu, 26 May 2005 14:29:36 +0000

Around the Blogosphere

Romney considers life! Michelle Malkin Liberals claim Newsweek story confirmed ...by Moslem extremists willing to murder. Good source there, guys....

By: The Galvin Opinion

The Galvin Opinion — Wed, 25 May 2005 20:45:03 +0000

THE GREAT COMPROMISE OF 2005? ANALYSIS OF THE SENA The Dems will be ready to use the filibuster again for a Sup Ct nominee. Forget about a promise to only filibuster in the future when there is Extraordinary Circumstances". For Dems, any nominee will be an "Extraordinary Circumstance".

By: Blogs for Bush

Blogs for Bush — Wed, 25 May 2005 18:57:57 +0000

Priscilla Owen Confirmed

56-43 UPDATE: Statement from Ken Mehlman. UPDATE: Statement from Bill Frist. UPDATE: Statement from John Cornyn. UPDATE: The upcoming battle over the Supreme Court... UPDATE: The Judicial Confirmation Network hails Owen's confirmation. UPDATE: Reactio...