working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

AHORRO EL G.O.P.

Dick Morris argues,

PRESIDENT Bush’s immigration/amnesty proposal will probably be remembered in history as the idea that saved a political party.

By taking the lead in extending the benefits of legal protections to more than 10 million illegal immigrants now living in the United States, Bush has taken a bold and dramatic step to avert the extinction of his own party.

Until Bush acted, the grinding inevitability of demographic change was likely to doom the GOP to an early death. As America became 1 percent more Hispanic each year, the Republicans could not concede this growing group to the Democrats by 2-1 ratios without risking total annihilation down the road.

The Republicans have got to break the solid demographic phalanx that sustains the Democratic Party: Blacks, Hispanics and single white women. Together, this group cast 25 percent of votes in 1990, 32 percent in 2000 and will account for 40 percent in 2008.

But by embracing the cause of Hispanic immigrants and extending to them elemental civil rights and minimum-wage protections, Bush has struck a blow on their behalf that will resonate in their voting habits for generations to come. His legislative proposals are akin to the sponsorship of a sweeping civil-rights bill in 1963-65 by Presidents Kennedy and Johnson and will have a similar effect in binding Hispanics to the Republicans as the civil-rights legislation did in linking blacks to the Democrats.

For decades, Republicans systematically alienated Hispanics by insisting on English-only initiatives, opposing benefits for illegal immigrants and demanding an end even to free public schools for the children of those who came here illegally. These measures drove Hispanics into the waiting arms of Democrats. Bush has now acted to reverse the legacy of these initiatives and to welcome Hispanics into the GOP.

This would certainly run counter to the thesis of John Judis and Ruy Teixeira’s famous The Emerging Democratic Majority. That said, while I understand that electoral politics is always a major consideration when making domestic policy–and indeed should be in a representative system–one hopes that it isn’t the primary motivation behind such a fundamental piece of legislation.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
Tags | US Politics
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

Morris is ascribing African-American-style voting behavior to a constituency that has never been that monolithic. He needs to quit snorting Desenex.

Posted by McGehee | January 15, 2004 | 03:42 pm | Permalink
 

I think that's right. On the other hand, Hispanics are a natural GOP constituency. They're reasonably religious and conservative. If they don't perceive the Republicans as anti-Hispanic, I think we'll at least forestall having 2/3 of an increasingly large population sector voting for the Democrats. Even if it goes to 50/50, that would be a huge gain.

Posted by James Joyner | January 15, 2004 | 03:47 pm | Permalink
 

Dick Morris is never right. About anything. I'm leery of quoting him even on whether or not the sun is shining.

Plus, he's a total slimeball. I don't trust anyone who turns on their friends.

Posted by Meryl Yourish | January 15, 2004 | 04:09 pm | Permalink
 

Bush is forestalling the demise of the G.O.P.? Huh? All I've heard is that the democratic party has been self-destructing.

Sorry, I'm not buying. Clearly, Bush is pandering to the hispanic vote, but leaping from there to the argument that he's staving off the vultures from the G.O.P. is laughable, especially given recent election history.

Posted by bryan | January 15, 2004 | 04:16 pm | Permalink
 

bryan,

The argument has abeen that demographic trends--especially the explosive growth of the Hispanic population--bodes poorly for the GOP. It has already made California a virtual Democrat lock whereas only 15 years ago it was a solid Republican state.

Posted by James Joyner | January 16, 2004 | 09:12 am | Permalink
 

James,

who's governor of california, again? ;-)

Posted by bryan | January 16, 2004 | 12:14 pm | Permalink
 

bryan: Arnold Schwarzenegger is Republican in the sense Zell Miller is a Democrat.

---

Posted by James Joyner | January 16, 2004 | 12:32 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

FOLLOW US

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.