<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Air Force Academy Unfriendly to Non-Christians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/air_force_cadets_see_religious_harassment_on_yahoo_news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/air_force_cadets_see_religious_harassment_on_yahoo_news/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:34:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oceanguy</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/air_force_cadets_see_religious_harassment_on_yahoo_news/comment-page-1/#comment-43462</link>
		<dc:creator>oceanguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10134#comment-43462</guid>
		<description>Not that the Navigators is an extremist group... When Even in the 70&#039;s wehn I was at Annapolisthe Navigators were an &quot;enthusiastic&quot; bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that the Navigators is an extremist group... When Even in the 70's wehn I was at Annapolisthe Navigators were an "enthusiastic" bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oceanguy</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/air_force_cadets_see_religious_harassment_on_yahoo_news/comment-page-1/#comment-43461</link>
		<dc:creator>oceanguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10134#comment-43461</guid>
		<description>I would also think the the Navigators&#039; International  Offices being in Colorado Springs would contribute to a bit of extremism showing it&#039;s ugly face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also think the the Navigators' International  Offices being in Colorado Springs would contribute to a bit of extremism showing it's ugly face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackLewis.net</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/air_force_cadets_see_religious_harassment_on_yahoo_news/comment-page-1/#comment-43445</link>
		<dc:creator>JackLewis.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10134#comment-43445</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Exactly who is being discriminated against?&lt;/strong&gt;
Outside the Beltway has a somewhat confusing post about an AP story that is even more confusing. First I&#039;ll dissect...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Exactly who is being discriminated against?</strong><br />
Outside the Beltway has a somewhat confusing post about an AP story that is even more confusing. First I'll dissect...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/air_force_cadets_see_religious_harassment_on_yahoo_news/comment-page-1/#comment-43438</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10134#comment-43438</guid>
		<description>squorch-
You&#039;re correct, but those 10% have an enormous lock on command and senior staff assignments. Fortunately, the AF has gotten away from the practice in the past decade or so, but up until the early 90s, it was not uncommon for a pilot who needed &quot;command experience&quot; on his record to get promoted to be placed in charge of any available unit (communications, CE, services, etc.), regardless of his experience in that unit&#039;s mission, and ahead of qualified officers in that career field.

These days there&#039;s a lot more opportunity for non-flying officers to advance past O-5, but a lot of the central leadership corps (and much of the AFA staff) are still in the pilot fraternity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>squorch-<br />
You're correct, but those 10% have an enormous lock on command and senior staff assignments. Fortunately, the AF has gotten away from the practice in the past decade or so, but up until the early 90s, it was not uncommon for a pilot who needed "command experience" on his record to get promoted to be placed in charge of any available unit (communications, CE, services, etc.), regardless of his experience in that unit's mission, and ahead of qualified officers in that career field.</p>
<p>These days there's a lot more opportunity for non-flying officers to advance past O-5, but a lot of the central leadership corps (and much of the AFA staff) are still in the pilot fraternity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/air_force_cadets_see_religious_harassment_on_yahoo_news/comment-page-1/#comment-43437</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10134#comment-43437</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this more of the &quot;few bad apples&quot; theory we&#039;ves seen applied in so many other circumstances?

It used to be that I thought the millitary buckled down and solved problems by staring them in the face and dealing with it.

Now I see that the new trend is to shift blame, point fingers and avoid responsibility by blaming the system.

Lovely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn't this more of the "few bad apples" theory we'ves seen applied in so many other circumstances?</p>
<p>It used to be that I thought the millitary buckled down and solved problems by staring them in the face and dealing with it.</p>
<p>Now I see that the new trend is to shift blame, point fingers and avoid responsibility by blaming the system.</p>
<p>Lovely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squorch</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/air_force_cadets_see_religious_harassment_on_yahoo_news/comment-page-1/#comment-43435</link>
		<dc:creator>Squorch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10134#comment-43435</guid>
		<description>Not that that matters, since less than 10% of AF officers fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that that matters, since less than 10% of AF officers fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/air_force_cadets_see_religious_harassment_on_yahoo_news/comment-page-1/#comment-43430</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10134#comment-43430</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll find that Air Force pilots have about the same career tracks as Army aviation (non-warrant) officers.   They will fly the first 8-10 years of their careers, and then slowly progress to the leadership/management track.  Basically their flying careers peak out about the time they make O-4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You'll find that Air Force pilots have about the same career tracks as Army aviation (non-warrant) officers.   They will fly the first 8-10 years of their careers, and then slowly progress to the leadership/management track.  Basically their flying careers peak out about the time they make O-4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our Life</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/air_force_cadets_see_religious_harassment_on_yahoo_news/comment-page-1/#comment-43420</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 12:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10134#comment-43420</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Round the Reader - Wednesday, 20 Apr 2005&lt;/strong&gt;
Guten Morgen, time for another Round the Reader. The big story of the week is the new Pope. If you&#039;ve been under a rock for the past 24 hours there is a new Pope, Benedict XVI. He&#039;s &quot;conservative&quot; (as if...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Round the Reader - Wednesday, 20 Apr 2005</strong><br />
Guten Morgen, time for another Round the Reader. The big story of the week is the new Pope. If you've been under a rock for the past 24 hours there is a new Pope, Benedict XVI. He's "conservative" (as if...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
