<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AKP Escapes Ban (Barely)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/akp_escapes_ban_barely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/akp_escapes_ban_barely/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:42:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: More on the AKP Ruling in Turkey</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/akp_escapes_ban_barely/comment-page-1/#comment-483143</link>
		<dc:creator>More on the AKP Ruling in Turkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/07/akp_escapes_ban_barely/#comment-483143</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday I noted the ruling regarding the banning (or not, as the case was) of the ruling AK party in Turkey. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday I noted the ruling regarding the banning (or not, as the case was) of the ruling AK party in Turkey. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/akp_escapes_ban_barely/comment-page-1/#comment-483118</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/07/akp_escapes_ban_barely/#comment-483118</guid>
		<description>Heh....

&lt;blockquote&gt;Still, the overall situation is not at healthy as one might like:

&lt;em&gt;At least seven of the 11 court judges would need to vote in favour for the party to be banned. But six judges wanted a ban and five did not want to do so.&lt;/em&gt;

Being one vote shy of being banned is escaping by the thinnest of margins.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

(Shake of the head) 
See also, 2nd Amendment, DC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh....</p>
<blockquote><p>Still, the overall situation is not at healthy as one might like:</p>
<p><em>At least seven of the 11 court judges would need to vote in favour for the party to be banned. But six judges wanted a ban and five did not want to do so.</em></p>
<p>Being one vote shy of being banned is escaping by the thinnest of margins.</p></blockquote>
<p>(Shake of the head)<br />
See also, 2nd Amendment, DC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
