working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

Al-Qaeda Dirty Bomb Plot

The Daily Telegraph reports that a British Al-Qaeda cell tried to buy radioactive materials to make a dirty bomb from the Russian mafia in Belgium. They were foiled by the diligent efforts of British security forces:

The men were under electronic surveillance for two months and were arrested on March 30, 2004. Police seized aluminium powder and 600kg of ammonium nitrate fertiliser, which could be turned into explosives, at a warehouse in Hanwell, West London.

The jury has heard the aim of the seven men – all British citizens – was to exact revenge on the UK for its support of the US in the war on terror. The jury also heard that one of the accused described the Madrid train bombings as “absolutely beautiful”.

Richard Gardner has the details at OTB News.

Suffice it to say, al Qaeda is actively trying to get WMD and is fully committed to using them. My hope is that we’ll always have good luck and great work by intelligence and law enforcement, such as we had in this case. Every instinct and history tell us otherwise.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

The Daily Telegraph reports that a British Al-Qaeda cell tried to buy radioactive materials to make a dirty bomb from the Russian mafia in Belgium.

Shall we invade Belgium or Russia first? Occupying Brussels might be a bit easier since it is primarily populated these days by EU bureaucrats. We could topple the regime of Barroso and probably take advantage of the help of Flemish separatists.

Posted by Bhoe | March 24, 2006 | 04:19 pm | Permalink
 

I say Russia first - we're sure to be greeted as heroes by the freedom-loving proletariat!

Apparently, when Bush looked into Putin's soul, he wasn't paying any more attention than he does to his Presidential Daily Briefs...

Posted by legion | March 24, 2006 | 05:36 pm | Permalink
 

Legion, Bhoe. How do you like your crow cooked? Or do you prefer it raw. Through the released documents from Iraq, ABC News, of all places, found a connection between al-Qaeda and Saddam. Time to move the goal posts.

Posted by Jack Ehrlich | March 24, 2006 | 06:32 pm | Permalink
 

http://www.aip.org/isns/reports/2002/038.html

and Jack-

(Editor's Note: The controversial claim that Osama bin Laden was cooperating with Saddam Hussein is an ongoing matter of intense debate. While the assertions contained in this document clearly support the claim, the sourcing is questionable � i.e., an unnamed Afghan "informant" reporting on a conversation with another Afghan "consul." The date of the document � four days after 9/11 � is worth noting but without further corroboration, this document is of limited evidentiary value.)

Posted by BWE | March 24, 2006 | 11:55 pm | Permalink
 

BWE, you've proven that ABC News felt the need to pin a disclaimer on documents that it found supportive of the Bush Administration's case for war.

How interesting that we're supposed to give ABC's intelligence judgment more weight than that of every intel agency in the world, which also supported the case for war.

Posted by McGehee | March 25, 2006 | 10:01 am | Permalink
 

And again, McG, you propagate the fakeitude that "eveybody thought Iraq had WMDs".
Of course they did - We told everybody they had WMDs, and everybody trusted the US gov't. They'll never make that mistake again, and neither will we.

Posted by legion | March 26, 2006 | 12:09 am | Permalink
 

And Legion, you put a lot at stake with your belief that because we haven't YET found WMD, that there were none.

Care to bet your convulsing and blistering body on it?

Posted by LJD | March 27, 2006 | 08:47 am | Permalink
 

The salient point isn't that "everybody thought Iraq had WMDs" except for weapons inspector Hans Blix who said Bush and Blair acted as if the were on a "witch hunt" when it came to Iraqi WMDs. The salient point is that very few believed Hussein was anywhere near an immediate threat to the West. Some confused people even thought Bin Laden was the real threat. That's why the neo-cons had to manipulate the intelligence to gin up images of mushroom clouds, etc. to scare the American people into going along with the Iraq distraction from the hunt for Bin Laden. In any event, turns out Hussein wasn't a threat. Meanwhile, Bin Laden survives 5 years later due to our great leader's incompetence.

LJD is obviously a man of faith. He strictly holds to a belief in "things unseen" like WMDs. That is commendable in some contexts, but a very Bin Laden-like rationale for supporting the killing of tens of thousands of innocent (Iraqi in this case) civilians. Do you also believe there are a bevy of Virgins eagerly awaiting your arrival in heaven, LJD?

Posted by Roger Ridenour | March 29, 2006 | 08:59 am | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

FOLLOW US

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.