And now to claim that the Democrats are impeding the hunt for Bin Laden! The mind boggles.

Do you really think that the Democrats would attempt to oppose a hunt for Bin Laden? Can you imagine anyone other than George W. Bush being able to get away with saying that he or she is not interested in hunting Bin Laden?

Tell you what, I'll make it really easy for you. Just name ONE Democrat, only one! who has come out against hunting for Bin Laden, or who has somehow in any way impeded or attempted to impede the hunt for Bin Laden.

No?

I must ask you readers a question: I'm curious. Why do you feel compelled to post things that any child would see are obvious falsehoods?

For those of you who keep posting that the Democrats are the allies of the terrorists... can you really be so crazy as to believe it? Do you have a little movie in your head of Mr. Obama going home and thinking, "How can I arrange for Americans to be killed?" or Mrs. Clinton thinking, "How can I keep Bin Laden from being captured?"

If you really believe the literal truth of these things, you should stop and think for a second. Such beliefs are not sane. You might not like the Democrats but it's absolutely not in their best interests to allow America to be attacked, to set their own house afire.

It's hard to think you really believe these things you post. Yet, it's hard to understand why screaming obvious falsehoods and spewing profanity and madness is going to somehow bolster your arguments either.

After having been relegated to the sidelines for years, Osama bin Laden and especially Ayman al-Zawahri, have regained a central role in directing al Qaeda and have reconstituted a large training operation on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, according ...

HEY check out this new political website. It has tons of political message boards and soon will have news updates.

James: Cleanup on isle 2 please, someone seems to have emptied some spam on the floor.

Bush is not serious about going after Bin Laden, he probably never was. He is too busy chasing windmills in Iraq.

WMD = Windmills of Mass Delusion?

HEY check out this new political website. It has tons of political message boards and soon will have news updates.

Wow! Political message boards without any updated news? On the Internet tubes? I didn't know such a thing was possible, please tell me more about this wonderful invention of yours!

Jay K.: The above was sarcasm, in case you are unsure.

http://www.electorials.com

There are so many things I didn't need to know ...

A few months ago a book called Ariel Sharon: An Intimate Portrait came out. It’s by the late Uri Dan, who was Sharon’s longtime confidant/bootlicker. It sounds like it’s worth skimming, at least for these two parts:

From a new review in Ha’aretz:

Speaking of George Bush, with whom Sharon developed a very close relationship, Uri Dan recalls that Sharon’s delicacy made him reluctant to repeat what the president had told him when they discussed Osama bin Laden. Finally he relented. And here is what the leader of the Western world, valiant warrior in the battle of cultures, promised to do to bin Laden if he caught him: “I will screw him in the ass!”

You folks better move your Publican White House to New Jersey.

someone above

That was me.

called this the most important war of our age.

That entire post was satire, or was it too subtle? I thought the whole "invade Britain" part was a giveaway.

if it is so damn important why arent we taking our panties off and fighting?

I don't wear panties, you? And even if I did, I think I'd rather fight dressed than naked. Just personal preferences, yours may vary.

I can’t decide what’s more bizarre: that Bush is planning to provide Musharraf with new F-16s, or that no one is mentioning that fact.

I'm guessing we are confident about shooting down F-16s, but it's rather odd.

I know, you now say If I think it is good it cannot be right.