<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All-Volunteer Force?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/all-volunteer_force/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/all-volunteer_force/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:31:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/all-volunteer_force/comment-page-1/#comment-17929</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6327#comment-17929</guid>
		<description>One of the great short novels written in the past 50 years is &quot;The Bridges at Toko-Ri.&quot;

One of the main themes of the novel is the recall of the veteran of World War II to fly again in Korea while others sit at home.

This book is the source of the oft quoted phrase, &quot;Where do we get such men?&quot;

If you haven&#039;t read it, spend a Sunday afternoon with it.  

Movie is good, too. Stars William Holden and Mickey Rooney as a CSAR helo pilot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the great short novels written in the past 50 years is "The Bridges at Toko-Ri."</p>
<p>One of the main themes of the novel is the recall of the veteran of World War II to fly again in Korea while others sit at home.</p>
<p>This book is the source of the oft quoted phrase, "Where do we get such men?"</p>
<p>If you haven't read it, spend a Sunday afternoon with it.  </p>
<p>Movie is good, too. Stars William Holden and Mickey Rooney as a CSAR helo pilot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/all-volunteer_force/comment-page-1/#comment-17930</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6327#comment-17930</guid>
		<description>When I first joined the Army, one of the guys who processed in with me was a reservist who &quot;neglected&quot; to attend drills.  He was called back to complete his (then) six-year obligation on active duty.  

I had a platoon sergeant in Vietnam who was drafted near the end of WWII, then called back for Korea.  He said that he finally decided to just stay in, since they kept calling him back.

One of Hal Moore&#039;s complaints in &quot;We Were Soldiers Once, and Young&quot; was that he lost many of his best trained soldiers just before deploying to Vietnam because the government didn&#039;t implement a stop-loss program.

The WWII soldiers were drafted for the &quot;Duration plus six months&quot;.  That was at least partly in response to the repeated difficulties suffered by American forces from the Revolution through the Civil War as a result of the expiration of conscripts terms of service.

Your point about the obligation for eight years service being little recognized, but still an obligation, is spot on.  I don&#039;t know how many recruiters explain that part of the deal to prospects, but they should.  Of course, if they do, they probably offer the caveat that &quot;while it&#039;s possible, it doesn&#039;t happen very often...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first joined the Army, one of the guys who processed in with me was a reservist who "neglected" to attend drills.  He was called back to complete his (then) six-year obligation on active duty.  </p>
<p>I had a platoon sergeant in Vietnam who was drafted near the end of WWII, then called back for Korea.  He said that he finally decided to just stay in, since they kept calling him back.</p>
<p>One of Hal Moore's complaints in "We Were Soldiers Once, and Young" was that he lost many of his best trained soldiers just before deploying to Vietnam because the government didn't implement a stop-loss program.</p>
<p>The WWII soldiers were drafted for the "Duration plus six months".  That was at least partly in response to the repeated difficulties suffered by American forces from the Revolution through the Civil War as a result of the expiration of conscripts terms of service.</p>
<p>Your point about the obligation for eight years service being little recognized, but still an obligation, is spot on.  I don't know how many recruiters explain that part of the deal to prospects, but they should.  Of course, if they do, they probably offer the caveat that "while it's possible, it doesn't happen very often..."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/all-volunteer_force/comment-page-1/#comment-17931</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6327#comment-17931</guid>
		<description>As someone who just spent a year in stop-loss status I am conflicted by it.  It allows the military to retain critical people during national emergencies but it isn&#039;t designed to be a long-term solution.  The Army has implemented stop-loss/stop-move in various forms since September 11, 2001 and it appears almost to be the status-quo.  That would be a negative.  Some of the other results is the delay of military schools: from OAC to the NCO schools; delay of movements, these events destabilize the Army as a whole.  Should there be more people?  I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who just spent a year in stop-loss status I am conflicted by it.  It allows the military to retain critical people during national emergencies but it isn't designed to be a long-term solution.  The Army has implemented stop-loss/stop-move in various forms since September 11, 2001 and it appears almost to be the status-quo.  That would be a negative.  Some of the other results is the delay of military schools: from OAC to the NCO schools; delay of movements, these events destabilize the Army as a whole.  Should there be more people?  I don't know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/all-volunteer_force/comment-page-1/#comment-17932</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6327#comment-17932</guid>
		<description>Just so there&#039;s no confusion of the facts:  stop-loss is applied to soldiers with MORE than 8 years service, too.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so there's no confusion of the facts:  stop-loss is applied to soldiers with MORE than 8 years service, too.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
