<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Active Duty Officers to Receive Regular Army Commissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/all_active_duty_officers_to_receive_regular_army_commissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/all_active_duty_officers_to_receive_regular_army_commissions/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:18:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/all_active_duty_officers_to_receive_regular_army_commissions/comment-page-1/#comment-37012</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9324#comment-37012</guid>
		<description>James, thanks for clarifying.... I saw the USMA part in the article I posted, just didn&#039;t know it applied to DMGs as well.

I was having a discussion about this with a friend who pointed out the CCB article to me and he missed the part about RA not getting preferential treatment in RIFs anymore over ARs but we both missed the DMG part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, thanks for clarifying.... I saw the USMA part in the article I posted, just didn't know it applied to DMGs as well.</p>
<p>I was having a discussion about this with a friend who pointed out the CCB article to me and he missed the part about RA not getting preferential treatment in RIFs anymore over ARs but we both missed the DMG part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/all_active_duty_officers_to_receive_regular_army_commissions/comment-page-1/#comment-37005</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9324#comment-37005</guid>
		<description>Of course in the days of the draft enlisted soldiers were distinguished between enlistees and draftees. Draftees serial numbers had a &quot;US&quot; prefix while enlistees serial numbers had the prefix &quot;RA&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course in the days of the draft enlisted soldiers were distinguished between enlistees and draftees. Draftees serial numbers had a "US" prefix while enlistees serial numbers had the prefix "RA".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/all_active_duty_officers_to_receive_regular_army_commissions/comment-page-1/#comment-37003</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9324#comment-37003</guid>
		<description>Not anymore--they took the RA away from DMGs and USMA grads in 1996.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not anymore--they took the RA away from DMGs and USMA grads in 1996.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/all_active_duty_officers_to_receive_regular_army_commissions/comment-page-1/#comment-37002</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9324#comment-37002</guid>
		<description>The one thing not mentioned is that DMGs in ROTC BNs  usually received a RA commission as well. That takes a small bit of luster off being a DMG now I would presume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing not mentioned is that DMGs in ROTC BNs  usually received a RA commission as well. That takes a small bit of luster off being a DMG now I would presume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
