<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Olympic Favoritism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/american_olympic_favoritism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/american_olympic_favoritism/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:10:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JM Hanes</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/american_olympic_favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-493389</link>
		<dc:creator>JM Hanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24771#comment-493389</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a sports fan, but I&#039;ll take in the World Series of just about anything. Watching the best of the best is almost always interesting.

Rooting for the home team doesn&#039;t bother me.  What I find objectionable is the media coverage.  You don&#039;t get the best of the best, let alone any of the rest, you just get the best of the Americans.  Coverage is not just focused on Amercian performers, to the exclusion of almost everyone else, it&#039;s obsessively fixated on the gold count.  When an athlete gets a bronze medal, the first question he&#039;s most likely to be asked is be how he feels about &lt;i&gt;losing&lt;/i&gt; the gold.

I can&#039;t recall the exact timeline, but I associate a decided change in media attitudes with the network shift that marked Dick Button&#039;s exit from the commentator&#039;s booth, because of a non-compete clause in his contract.  The &quot;new improved&quot; model consisted of substituting soft-focus &quot;human interest&quot; athelete profiles (all conveniently taped in advance) for the real drama and coherent coverage of the actual competitions. There were suddenly countless events where the network didn&#039;t even bother to cover anyone but the American competitor at all.   That&#039;s when I began to lose interest in the whole affair.  It was like baseball stats without the baseball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not a sports fan, but I'll take in the World Series of just about anything. Watching the best of the best is almost always interesting.</p>
<p>Rooting for the home team doesn't bother me.  What I find objectionable is the media coverage.  You don't get the best of the best, let alone any of the rest, you just get the best of the Americans.  Coverage is not just focused on Amercian performers, to the exclusion of almost everyone else, it's obsessively fixated on the gold count.  When an athlete gets a bronze medal, the first question he's most likely to be asked is be how he feels about <i>losing</i> the gold.</p>
<p>I can't recall the exact timeline, but I associate a decided change in media attitudes with the network shift that marked Dick Button's exit from the commentator's booth, because of a non-compete clause in his contract.  The "new improved" model consisted of substituting soft-focus "human interest" athelete profiles (all conveniently taped in advance) for the real drama and coherent coverage of the actual competitions. There were suddenly countless events where the network didn't even bother to cover anyone but the American competitor at all.   That's when I began to lose interest in the whole affair.  It was like baseball stats without the baseball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Stinson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/american_olympic_favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-493025</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Stinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 11:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24771#comment-493025</guid>
		<description>Well, from watching the media over here it&#039;s pretty bloody obvious that the Chinese not only favor sports like ping pong, gymnastics, and tennis, but also choose to focus almost exclusively on Chinese team competition when repeating highlights.  In other words, America is totally unexceptional when it comes to this kind of coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, from watching the media over here it's pretty bloody obvious that the Chinese not only favor sports like ping pong, gymnastics, and tennis, but also choose to focus almost exclusively on Chinese team competition when repeating highlights.  In other words, America is totally unexceptional when it comes to this kind of coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bains</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/american_olympic_favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-492902</link>
		<dc:creator>bains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24771#comment-492902</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2008/olympics08/index.php?id=/photos/2008/olympics08/1/DV372881&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;finish line photo&lt;/a&gt; added...
The games are great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2008/olympics08/index.php?id=/photos/2008/olympics08/1/DV372881" rel="nofollow">finish line photo</a> added...<br />
The games are great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bains</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/american_olympic_favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-492897</link>
		<dc:creator>bains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24771#comment-492897</guid>
		<description>OK, I lied.  Following up with minutia, Samuel Sánchez (Spain) won one of the first golds of these Olympic games. Road cycling.  His name is lost to the world outside Spain, but not lost in the world of cycling.  A worthy champion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I lied.  Following up with minutia, Samuel Sánchez (Spain) won one of the first golds of these Olympic games. Road cycling.  His name is lost to the world outside Spain, but not lost in the world of cycling.  A worthy champion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bains</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/american_olympic_favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-492840</link>
		<dc:creator>bains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24771#comment-492840</guid>
		<description>First, too often critics forget that every other citizen of another nation is rooting for their &#039;home team&#039;.  It is self deception, and utter arrogance, to only accuse the USA of this.

Second, as a devoted follower of more obscure sports - cycling, sailing, and skiing - I like the Olympics.  Certainly all three have a bigger prize outside of the Olympic realm, and in fact, I really don&#039;t pay too much attention to Olympic cycling, yet the international competition enthralls me.  Not only have most of the competitors faced off against one another, by in many instances, they were, and will be again, team-mates.  Any bets on how many non-US citizens attend US schools?

The point being, it is in the spirit of the games that competitors represent their country - and with few exceptions they do it well - and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.  Chances are that those admonishing nationalistic tendencies are only admonishing their own countrymen, and have a pre-existing self-loathing of their country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, too often critics forget that every other citizen of another nation is rooting for their 'home team'.  It is self deception, and utter arrogance, to only accuse the USA of this.</p>
<p>Second, as a devoted follower of more obscure sports - cycling, sailing, and skiing - I like the Olympics.  Certainly all three have a bigger prize outside of the Olympic realm, and in fact, I really don't pay too much attention to Olympic cycling, yet the international competition enthralls me.  Not only have most of the competitors faced off against one another, by in many instances, they were, and will be again, team-mates.  Any bets on how many non-US citizens attend US schools?</p>
<p>The point being, it is in the spirit of the games that competitors represent their country - and with few exceptions they do it well - and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.  Chances are that those admonishing nationalistic tendencies are only admonishing their own countrymen, and have a pre-existing self-loathing of their country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/american_olympic_favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-492815</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24771#comment-492815</guid>
		<description>There was a great heavywieght Russian weightlifter years ago, Vasiliy Alekseyev, who was asked if he&#039;d watched the bantam-weight (or whatever it&#039;s called) competition. No, he said, who wants to watch little men lifting little weights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a great heavywieght Russian weightlifter years ago, Vasiliy Alekseyev, who was asked if he'd watched the bantam-weight (or whatever it's called) competition. No, he said, who wants to watch little men lifting little weights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/american_olympic_favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-492808</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24771#comment-492808</guid>
		<description>Well, if we view all of this as part of something larger, perhaps the larger question here is what is wrong with cheering for one&#039;s own country even outside the sports arena, and hoping they win?  I mean, I recognize that&#039;s become &#039;uncool&#039;... We&#039;ve seen so little of it from our own Congress of late, for example...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if we view all of this as part of something larger, perhaps the larger question here is what is wrong with cheering for one's own country even outside the sports arena, and hoping they win?  I mean, I recognize that's become 'uncool'... We've seen so little of it from our own Congress of late, for example...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/american_olympic_favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-492802</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24771#comment-492802</guid>
		<description>I am generally with you on the olympics.

I especially hate swimming and track and field--the only way racing in any form is interesting is if you have money riding on it--like at the horses.

Hell, the Olympics is so lame that even the horse events don&#039;t have betting!

I dig soccer in general, so I&#039;ll watch that.  Luckily, most of the major pros are playing, so it will be a decent tourney (unlike, say, baseball).

I actually love watching badminton, but they never seem to show much of it.

But in general, with the baseball pennant races heating up, I&#039;ll be watching that this month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am generally with you on the olympics.</p>
<p>I especially hate swimming and track and field--the only way racing in any form is interesting is if you have money riding on it--like at the horses.</p>
<p>Hell, the Olympics is so lame that even the horse events don't have betting!</p>
<p>I dig soccer in general, so I'll watch that.  Luckily, most of the major pros are playing, so it will be a decent tourney (unlike, say, baseball).</p>
<p>I actually love watching badminton, but they never seem to show much of it.</p>
<p>But in general, with the baseball pennant races heating up, I'll be watching that this month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/american_olympic_favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-492801</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24771#comment-492801</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re just a jingoistic narcissist. Or something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're just a jingoistic narcissist. Or something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
