Comments on: API Blogger Conference Call http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/api_blogger_conference_call/ Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:42:30 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: The Glittering Eye » Blog Archive » API Blogger Conference Call http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/api_blogger_conference_call/comment-page-1/#comment-267478 The Glittering Eye » Blog Archive » API Blogger Conference Call Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:16:58 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/api_blogger_conference_call/#comment-267478 [...] I published a little report on the blogger conference call hosted by the American Petroleum Institute in which I participated yesterday over at Outside the Beltway. [...] [...] I published a little report on the blogger conference call hosted by the American Petroleum Institute in which I participated yesterday over at Outside the Beltway. [...]

]]> By: Triumph http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/api_blogger_conference_call/comment-page-1/#comment-267203 Triumph Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:08:22 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/api_blogger_conference_call/#comment-267203 Ask their take on the Bali conference and how they are preparing for a likely national cap-and-trade emissions policy once Bush retires. Ask their take on the Bali conference and how they are preparing for a likely national cap-and-trade emissions policy once Bush retires.

]]> By: spencer http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/api_blogger_conference_call/comment-page-1/#comment-267196 spencer Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:31:30 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/api_blogger_conference_call/#comment-267196 I've argued for years that the real reason no new refineries were being built is that the market through low refining profits was sending the message that we did not need any new refineries. That position still looks valid and all the arguments that it was government keeping new refineries from being built still looks like simple political posturing. I've argued for years that the real reason no new refineries were being built is that the market through low refining profits was sending the message that we did not need any new refineries.

That position still looks valid and all the arguments that it was government keeping new refineries from being built still looks like simple political posturing.

]]> By: DL http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/api_blogger_conference_call/comment-page-1/#comment-267195 DL Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:24:47 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/api_blogger_conference_call/#comment-267195 Nice information on the energy front. I wonder with ethanol having to be driven to refineries, what the real cost/efficiency benifit of producing the stuff in such large amounts. I'm for drilling while were waiting for this miraculous alternate fuel bonanza the eco-left keeps talking about. As new sources of alternate fuels become available and on line we can close some fields and platforms to match it and still commit to reducing our carbon footprint. I suppose such a prudent, and in view of potential war, such reasonable measures wil be rejected by the eco-left and their couwardly political servants. Nice information on the energy front. I wonder with ethanol having to be driven to refineries, what the real cost/efficiency benifit of producing the stuff in such large amounts.

I'm for drilling while were waiting for this miraculous alternate fuel bonanza the eco-left keeps talking about. As new sources of alternate fuels become available and on line we can close some fields and platforms to match it and still commit to reducing our carbon footprint.

I suppose such a prudent, and in view of potential war, such reasonable measures wil be rejected by the eco-left and their couwardly political servants.

]]> By: Dave Schuler http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/api_blogger_conference_call/comment-page-1/#comment-267179 Dave Schuler Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:21:01 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/api_blogger_conference_call/#comment-267179 Thanks, anon. Very helpful. Thanks, anon. Very helpful.

]]> By: Anon http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/api_blogger_conference_call/comment-page-1/#comment-267177 Anon Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:20:00 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/api_blogger_conference_call/#comment-267177 Regarding the ethanol in pipeline issue, these links may be of interest: <a href="http://www.agmrc.org/NR/rdonlyres/4EE0E81C-C607-4C3F-BBCF-B75B7395C881/0/ksupipelineethl.pdf" rel="nofollow">Link 1</a> <a href="http://www.enewsbuilder.net/aopl/e_article000570935.cfm" rel="nofollow">Link 2</a> <a href="http://www.grainnet.com/articles/BFJ_com_WEB__EXCLUSIVE__DOE_s_Ethanol_Pipeline_Study_Will_Determine_Feasibility_of_Constructing_Dedicated_Infrastructure_to_Transport_Ethanol_____by_M_D__Brading__Biofuels_Journal_Associate_Editor-37886.html" rel="nofollow">Link 3</a> Regarding the ethanol in pipeline issue, these links may be of interest:

Link 1
Link 2
Link 3

]]>