http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/are_aba_judicial_ratings_neutral/ Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:35:48 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/are_aba_judicial_ratings_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-82013 McGehee Wed, 10 May 2006 17:14:01 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/are_aba_judicial_ratings_neutral/#comment-82013 What changed is, the Gang of 14 actually turns out to have had an apparent positive impact on the judicial confirmation process, so the Bush opponents have had to re-double their efforts. What changed is, the Gang of 14 actually turns out to have had an apparent positive impact on the judicial confirmation process, so the Bush opponents have had to re-double their efforts.

]]> http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/are_aba_judicial_ratings_neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-81989 yetanotherjohn Wed, 10 May 2006 15:38:57 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/are_aba_judicial_ratings_neutral/#comment-81989 More importantly to me, what was their reason for their shift from a year ago. Was it a change in the committee? Did they come across some new data? Was it the difference between Bush's poll numbers now and then? Something moved. Is it real (he was found with a live boy or a dead girl in his bed, metaphorically speaking) or is it a partisan artifact? More importantly to me, what was their reason for their shift from a year ago. Was it a change in the committee? Did they come across some new data? Was it the difference between Bush's poll numbers now and then? Something moved. Is it real (he was found with a live boy or a dead girl in his bed, metaphorically speaking) or is it a partisan artifact?

]]>