<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Armenia Genocide &#8211; Obama&#8217;s About Face</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/armenia_genocide_-_obamas_about_face/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/armenia_genocide_-_obamas_about_face/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:16:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Netlog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/armenia_genocide_-_obamas_about_face/comment-page-1/#comment-998659</link>
		<dc:creator>Netlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33472#comment-998659</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Netlog...&lt;/strong&gt;

... you won&#039;t have to understand by using simple terms as much as 95% of the most important things 1. you must always do is I have not used that approach, but more of your article is about 2 sentences. 7=8 - I know -
if I want more and click on form.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Netlog...</strong></p>
<p>... you won't have to understand by using simple terms as much as 95% of the most important things 1. you must always do is I have not used that approach, but more of your article is about 2 sentences. 7=8 - I know -<br />
if I want more and click on form.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nightly Ramble:The White Billboard edition &#124; BitsBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/armenia_genocide_-_obamas_about_face/comment-page-1/#comment-993655</link>
		<dc:creator>Nightly Ramble:The White Billboard edition &#124; BitsBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33472#comment-993655</guid>
		<description>[...] as I have always insisted there would be.  References to this today come from all over, notably James Joyner, Byron York,  and the AP.     Clearly, the now axiomatic point that all of Obama&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as I have always insisted there would be.  References to this today come from all over, notably James Joyner, Byron York,  and the AP.     Clearly, the now axiomatic point that all of Obama&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/armenia_genocide_-_obamas_about_face/comment-page-1/#comment-993581</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33472#comment-993581</guid>
		<description>For all time?
No.

Until it&#039;s usful again in creating votes/maintaining power?

You betcha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all time?<br />
No.</p>
<p>Until it's usful again in creating votes/maintaining power?</p>
<p>You betcha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/armenia_genocide_-_obamas_about_face/comment-page-1/#comment-993579</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33472#comment-993579</guid>
		<description>I fail to see an &quot;About Face&quot; here yet.  Has Obama actually spoken about Armenia since he became President, or has he been busy with other stuff?

Just because some low-level official didn&#039;t use the word genocide is hardly proof that the word is banned for all time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see an "About Face" here yet.  Has Obama actually spoken about Armenia since he became President, or has he been busy with other stuff?</p>
<p>Just because some low-level official didn't use the word genocide is hardly proof that the word is banned for all time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/armenia_genocide_-_obamas_about_face/comment-page-1/#comment-993573</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33472#comment-993573</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Certainly, Obama boxed himself into a corner on this one, talking boldly on the campaign trail and then acting less boldly upon talking office.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Far from an outstanding event, this is merely one more datapoint, in a long list of such backtracking by Obama once office was attained. Exposure to reality does much to focus the mind. 

Beisdes, the alligator theory applies, here. To wit: When you&#039;re up to your ass in gators, its not easy to remember your original objective was drain the swamp. You might wanna ask Nancy Pelosi about that, who, despite her promsies to drain the swamp, ended up merely adding to it.

The comparison here seem valid to me, since in both cases, the question logically arises, if either ever really planned on following through on their rather grandiose promises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Certainly, Obama boxed himself into a corner on this one, talking boldly on the campaign trail and then acting less boldly upon talking office.</p></blockquote>
<p>Far from an outstanding event, this is merely one more datapoint, in a long list of such backtracking by Obama once office was attained. Exposure to reality does much to focus the mind. </p>
<p>Beisdes, the alligator theory applies, here. To wit: When you're up to your ass in gators, its not easy to remember your original objective was drain the swamp. You might wanna ask Nancy Pelosi about that, who, despite her promsies to drain the swamp, ended up merely adding to it.</p>
<p>The comparison here seem valid to me, since in both cases, the question logically arises, if either ever really planned on following through on their rather grandiose promises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
