It is what is considered the highest of reactive armour not even used on M1 Abrams. It is MY (own), design but proven ...If you can place me in contact with either the DOD or this company this editorial is about & have them contact me immediately at my home or work as I assemble military hardware every day and have full MIL Standard skills and certifications; ----I already build the military hardware... Name is Chris Taggert# 410-239-2520 Work at PSI in Jessup,Md main contractor for Norhtrop Grumman and US NAVY....as well as the US Army.....Trying to contact John Nehmans in LA or who may be interested in Armor fully capable of stopping all rounds and very powerful explosisions in Iraq....
410-7924754 ext:267 I need to first get a
proposal written up and then have an Auto CAD schematic & diagrams designed on this shield....

My brother is an Officer in the US Army and will be sent soon to Iraq....He may see action! It is imperative that this shield be adminsited immediately or others may be in harms way ---NO even the hardest armour plating is not sufficient

I know much of metallurgy and Physics and Donald Rumsfield "IS" correct, no amount of armor is sufficient "but" The Laws Of physics ---IS!!!!!

I do have the solution ;Please contact someone as I am just an Assembler but highly skilled in all forms of protection for equipment and Metallurgy!

Thank you and please see someone important gets this. I shall be glad to explain in detail as I am a modest-man and it will take the big machines such as I work with at our company to produce this.......NEW ARMOR.....

Former Republican congressman Matt Salmon of Arizona, a spokesman for ArmorWorks in Tempe, Ariz., said his company will finish a $30 million contract with the Pentagon this month to make 1,500 armor kits for Humvees. "We are at 50% capacity, and we could do a lot more," he said. "They are aware of it."

Armor Holdings of Jacksonville told the Army last month it could add armor to as many as 550 trucks a month, up from 450, said Robert Mecredy of its aerospace and defense group. "We're prepared to build 50 to 100 vehicles more per month," he said.

Sorry if my concern for our guys in Iraq annoys you. Please feel free to blame the Iraq disaster on the media or tell us how the sun shines out of Bush's ass or whatever else you wish to share...

My goodness, I actually proposed holding a senior goverment official accountable for poor job performance which let to American servicmen being killed and wounded. What the hell am I thinking?

"We've got about 30,000 wheeled vehicles in our theater -- in Iraq and Afghanistan and other areas that CFLCC and Central Command operate. Of that 30,000 vehicles, around a little less than 8,000 of them do not have some type of armor protection on them -- level one, two or three. Of those vehicles that don't, some number of them are things like tool trucks, communication vans or vehicles that don't leave the base camp. In other words, they're trucked up into Iraq -- or in cases before what we're doing now, were driven up into Iraq -- and they go onto a base camp, and that's where they spend most of their time."

"There are 19,000 Humvees in the U.S. Central Command area of operations. This area extends from Kazakhstan to Kenya. Of these, officials said, 15,000 are armored vehicles or have been fitted with armor.[snip]

The armor issue certainly is a high priority for the military. "People like having that security, that's for sure," said an Army spokesman. The Army is speeding up production of armor add-on kits not only for Humvees, but also for all wheeled vehicles that will be deployed to the CENTCOM area. To date, the Army has added armor to 507 heavy tactical trucks, to 492 medium tactical vehicles, to two heavy equipment trailers, to eight M-915 trucks and to 187 palletized load system vehicles.

The Army has four depots, two arsenals and one ammunition plant working on the armor kits. Overall production is in the 100s per month."

Remember: This is the first time in American history when armor was being provided for every vehicle a soldier could possibly ride in. No such protections existed in Bosnia, Gulf War 1, Vietnam, Korea, etc.

However, amongst the media frenzy, there are some other things to consider... First, not every troop lacking the armor is in Fallujah, or a place of similar violence. I would say with some certainty that the troops in Kuwait and Qatar do not require the same level of protection as those in the Sunni Triangle.

Second, there is nothing that can be done which provides 100% results. There is no protection available to prevent injury or death to all of our soldiers, all of the time. The M1 Abrams was thought to be invincible for a long time. We have seen them burned by relatively primative weapons.

Lastly, if the soldiers in question had just arrived in Kuwait, to be sent into theater, then they were still deploying. What would they know about the conditions where they're headed? Observing the media's knowledge of military hardware in the past, and knowing that they cued the soldiers questioning Rumsfeld, makes it all the more speculative. Yeah, Rumsfeld's answer was lame, and dumb. He deserves to get burned for it. But I have yet to see the facts supporting the case.

OEM armor is superior to later add-ons. The rule applies to military vehicles as much as it does to your private car. While there may be some exceptions, OEM equipment is generally designed to meet the mechanical needs of the entire system, not just a single feature.

This, incidentally, is why US ambassador's cars overseas are always "foreign" (Mercedes, for the most part.) No US manufacturer is currently making an affordable armored sedan. A half-million dollars is not a good investment for a couple of hundred ambassadors. It makes good sense for a President or Vice President. But those cars mostly get after-market up-armoring in a very special way.

I'd be interested in a factual examination of just how much of a difference armor on Humvees really makes in terms of the injuries suffered by troops in Iraq.

If a reporter from Chattanooga cooked up the current controversy mainly because he was going to be traveling in an unarmored Humvee, it's worth considering the possibility this isn't as real an issue as everyone's saying.

I have been tracking stories about the lack of armor for a while - I find it truly amazing that in a capatilist society like ours, only two companies are capable of supplying the up-armor kits - these aren't complicated items - I can understand other companies not being able to make an armored HMMWV right off the assembly line

I would bet the pentagon is dragging its feet for two reasons:
1. cost
2. wear and tear of up-armor on HMMWV (b/c of the added weight on a frame not designed to hold it - long term cost of replacing HMMWV in the future
Either way this is sad - letting costs win out over soldiers' lives and limbs
my two cents anyway...