working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

Army Revising Ambush-Training Regimen

Army Times

Fort A.P. Hill, Va., opened its new convoy live-fire range Thursday designed to teach soldiers how to react to ambushes that have become commonplace in Iraq.
The 6.3 kilometer course includes several challenging scenarios that require units to engage pop-up targets with live ammunition. There also are situations that expose soldiers to simulated improvised explosive devices and rocket propelled grenades.

“We are training for today’s attacks,” said Lt. Col. Earl Kennedy, chief instructor of U.S. Army Transportation School at Fort Eustis, Va.

Excellent news. This supplements training all soldiers receive in basic training and training being done in theater. While this sounds rather obvious in hindsight–especially for people whose understanding of the military shaped by the entertainment industry, where every cook is also a Navy SEAL–soldiers in the transportation business were never prepared for this type of scenario. Traditionally, their work was behind friendly lines. Unfortunately, in modern war, there’s no longer such a line.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

Good idea all-around. This is merely the first step of such training. When a unit gets their warning order, additional training is then given. This additional training adds a much more serious ingrediant: civilians that may or may not help the mission. Finally, you have a extended war game that brings it all together.

Posted by Jim | April 4, 2004 | 10:32 am | Permalink
 

Re: Iraq Humvees

Dear Warrior Leaders of the Free,
please don't think it too bold of me
to point out here and clearly state
they’re armored like a paper plate.

Posted by I.M. Rhimin | April 4, 2004 | 04:07 pm | Permalink
 

Funny,
A interesting thing happened in the Iraq war: those who were considered combat support ended up on the front lines. The Humvee was not intended for front-line combat but the armoed Humvee is better then a 'paper plate.' It is sad it took so long to bring them to the troops but it isn't some Bush conspicacy no matter what the previous commentor thinks.

Posted by Jim | April 4, 2004 | 07:05 pm | Permalink
 

Heck, I went to combat with a regular Humvee during the first Gulf War. Only the MPs had the Kevlar hardtop version until very recently. But, no, it wasn't designed as an urban assault vehicle--it least not in standard configuration.

Posted by James Joyner | April 4, 2004 | 07:12 pm | Permalink
 

Hello?

The Humvee was designed to replace what?

Anyone?

Anyone?

A Friggin' Jeep!

Not a tank, not an APC, a JEEP!

---

Posted by Rich | April 5, 2004 | 11:48 am | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

FOLLOW US

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.