<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Babies Skirt Campaign Finance Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/babies_skirt_campaign_finance_laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/babies_skirt_campaign_finance_laws/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:09:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lurker of sorts</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/babies_skirt_campaign_finance_laws/comment-page-1/#comment-198701</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurker of sorts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/babies_skirt_campaign_finance_laws/#comment-198701</guid>
		<description>I can only find Elrick and Cain in the FEC database but then the others probably have a different last name.  The linked article does not indicate what their last name is.

Also the article says the trust fund manager acted in their stead which probably was never even considered in the FEC regulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only find Elrick and Cain in the FEC database but then the others probably have a different last name.  The linked article does not indicate what their last name is.</p>
<p>Also the article says the trust fund manager acted in their stead which probably was never even considered in the FEC regulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JKB</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/babies_skirt_campaign_finance_laws/comment-page-1/#comment-198240</link>
		<dc:creator>JKB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/babies_skirt_campaign_finance_laws/#comment-198240</guid>
		<description>Well, these kids might want to get their finances straight lest the IRS start inquiring as to whether they declared this income they are not donating.  This is politics, unpaid payroll, income, or gift taxes and under the table income, even to a child, can flare up when the partisans start fighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, these kids might want to get their finances straight lest the IRS start inquiring as to whether they declared this income they are not donating.  This is politics, unpaid payroll, income, or gift taxes and under the table income, even to a child, can flare up when the partisans start fighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/babies_skirt_campaign_finance_laws/comment-page-1/#comment-198175</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/babies_skirt_campaign_finance_laws/#comment-198175</guid>
		<description>Should private donations be allowed only from eligible voters? Otherwise it appears to be de facto enfranchisement of the ineligible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should private donations be allowed only from eligible voters? Otherwise it appears to be de facto enfranchisement of the ineligible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave from the Lake Effect Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/babies_skirt_campaign_finance_laws/comment-page-1/#comment-198153</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave from the Lake Effect Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/babies_skirt_campaign_finance_laws/#comment-198153</guid>
		<description>So are Sen. Obama or his supporters breaking the law or not?  It stands to reason that those who are ineligible to vote in our elections should also not be eligible to contribute to political campaigns, so on what basis did our glorious conservative Supreme Court strike the provision down?  Hmm?  Could it make things less convenient for certain fundamentalist wackos with extra-large families when it comes to funding the campaigns of like-minded Republican politicians?  Seems this has backfired.  Interesting times....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are Sen. Obama or his supporters breaking the law or not?  It stands to reason that those who are ineligible to vote in our elections should also not be eligible to contribute to political campaigns, so on what basis did our glorious conservative Supreme Court strike the provision down?  Hmm?  Could it make things less convenient for certain fundamentalist wackos with extra-large families when it comes to funding the campaigns of like-minded Republican politicians?  Seems this has backfired.  Interesting times....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
