working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

Bad Military Reporting

Why can’t major press outlets assign reporters to beats with at least a modicum of knowledge of their subject? This is from an AP story written by Lolita C. Baldor:

For example, about six in 10 West Point soldiers who graduated in 1997 reenlisted after their sixth year. But just 53 percent of those who graduated in 2000 — and likely have spent much of the last six years rotating in and out of the war zones — have signed up for another tour.

Aside from the fact that a difference of perhaps less than 7 percent may not be that big a deal, West Point graduates are commissioned officers. They do not “enlist.” When their initial tours are over, they do not “re-enlist.” Indeed, they don’t do anything in particular. They simply don’t resign.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

I would agree that at the very least reporters covering military matters should either be knowledgable of military matters or take the time to learn what they are reporting.

The difference between commissioned officers and enlisted isn't that difficult to learn with a few minutes of research. Shoot a few questions on the differences to those in the know would quickly clear that up.

Reporters also tend to miss the fact that every person that signs up for miitary duty actually commits to 8 years of service in some combination of active duty and reserves.

Posted by just me | May 12, 2007 | 09:05 am | Permalink
 

It could be worse. The local newspaper had an editorial cartoon about President Hamilton's portrait on the $10-bill.

Posted by William d'Inger | May 12, 2007 | 01:06 pm | Permalink
 

Personally, I'm more concerned with getting a more realistic understanding of the military into Congress & the White House. _Then_ I'll worry about getting it into the reporters...

Posted by legion | May 14, 2007 | 10:37 am | Permalink
 

"Why can't major press outlets assign reporters to beats with at least a modicum of knowledge of the subject?"
Answer: There are no reporters with a modicum of knowledge about anything. They are journalism majors. As a class, reporters know nothing about history, politics, economics, military affairs, law, engineering, medicine, science, seafaring, music, aviation, or religion. They take a vow of ignorance upon being hired.

Posted by David Starr | May 14, 2007 | 11:48 am | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.