-- On a side note some people are still gullible enought to believe in global warming? go figure.

For starters, though, how about well over 50 million dead babies that no one on the liberal side mourns at all? Ah! Ah! Don't dare say that the rate of abortions is falling! Not so!

Global Warming isn't science, it has been made a hoax BY science, many times over.

Where was your Ph.D. in climate science from Bithead? You know the one I mean- the one that makes you more qualified than the entire rest of the scientific community...

See this is why I made the point I did, you are EXACTLY like the flat earthers, EXACTLY like the crationists, and EXACTLY like the geocentric universe-ers. You believe you know more about one corner of the world than the thousands of people who have worked hard, experimented, collaborated, predicted, and detected in order to understand that corner.

And what makes you qualified? Nothing, but a deep down desire not to believe, which just like wioth the flat earthers, trumps all logic and fact.

Global Warming isn't science, it has been made a hoax BY science

Ok, you can disagree on the amount caused by humans, you can disagree on the amount of "doom and gloom" it is going to cause, but you can't say that Global Warming doesn't happen.

This goes back to our previous discussions on Evolution, if something has been proven you can't still disbelieve in it. CO2 traps heat in the atmosphere, we know that. Burning oil and coal takes carbon from underground, and puts it into the atmosphere, we know that. Therefore burning oil and coal causes more heat to be trapped in the atmosphere, this is indisputable.

Any Republican must be better than Hillary or Obama; at least they wear the elephant on their lapels.

Seriously? Do you think the Medicare prescription drug card plan would have passed a GOP majority in congress if it were proposed by a Hillary Clinton Administration? Heck, even a GOP minority would have done their best to block that.

A liberal Democrat would be opposed by conservatives in Congress, but a liberal (fiscally anyway) Republican would has hardly been opposed by either conservative Republicans or Liberal Democrats. Just compare what passed during Clinton's administration with a GOP congress to what passed during Bush's administration with a GOP congress.

If you really do care about conservative ideals, you should probably prefer a liberal you will oppose to a liberal you won't.

Bainbridge knew this too--from the start, I believe.

Well, Bainbridge lives in California, which will almost certainly cast all of its Electoral Votes for the Democrat. It's not as if he's in a swing state.

I see you don't list 2004.

Nope. An easy enough choice and all, but not much excitement the second go-round.

I’ve been truly excited to vote twice* — for Reagan in 1984 and Bush in 2000

Did Gore run over your dog? Twice?

I see you don't list 2004.

(If I sound a little tired of the nonsense, it's what I intend.)

Global Warming isn't science, it has been made a hoax BY science, many times over. And that McCain signs onto it, tells me all I need to know about how much tax money and jobs are going to be sacrificed to this phantom crisis under a McCain presidency.

And oh, by the way, had you noticed he's not been saying much on that topic of late, partyicularly where he has to deal with actual Republicans? We USED to call that "Pandering".

Bainbridge knew this too--from the start, I believe.

Wasn't Gramm in 1996?

Strangely, yes. Time really flies!

Not sure who I initially supported in 2000. Maybe Kasich?

I've been genuinely excited in voting twice as well...for Clinton in 1992 and 1996. I'm for Hillary this time, but it isn't the same!