<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Balancing the Federal Budget: What to Cut?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:25:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/comment-page-1/#comment-76970</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/#comment-76970</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Countering Three Liberals On The Economy...&lt;/strong&gt;

Atrios, Kevin Drum, and Andrew Sullivan have been knocking heads over the economy. Here&#039;s a short summary from Outside The......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Countering Three Liberals On The Economy...</strong></p>
<p>Atrios, Kevin Drum, and Andrew Sullivan have been knocking heads over the economy. Here's a short summary from Outside The......</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/comment-page-1/#comment-76959</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/#comment-76959</guid>
		<description>McGehee, 

As usual you do not know what you are talking about. 

The United States cannot afford to default on its debt to any creditor. Default would destroy the value of our currency. Money is nothing but credit. It is the same thing as debt. Debt is freely traded on a global basis twenty four hours a day, seven days a week. Worldwide trading peaks during the New York session but continues overnight around the globe. 

All China would have to do is sell the US treasury debt it now owns into this market. They could time their sales to correspond to our Treasury auctions, driving down the prices to ridiculous levels and driving up the interest rates. 

Since the UST is the benchmark against with all risk is measured this would drive interest rates up on everything. 

China has enough clout to cause more pain than our economy could withstand. 

But if the US said it was going to default on this debt it would affect the value of all outstanding treasury debt. The UST debt is the most liquid fungible commodity in the world. A default on any of it would make all of it worth less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McGehee, </p>
<p>As usual you do not know what you are talking about. </p>
<p>The United States cannot afford to default on its debt to any creditor. Default would destroy the value of our currency. Money is nothing but credit. It is the same thing as debt. Debt is freely traded on a global basis twenty four hours a day, seven days a week. Worldwide trading peaks during the New York session but continues overnight around the globe. </p>
<p>All China would have to do is sell the US treasury debt it now owns into this market. They could time their sales to correspond to our Treasury auctions, driving down the prices to ridiculous levels and driving up the interest rates. </p>
<p>Since the UST is the benchmark against with all risk is measured this would drive interest rates up on everything. </p>
<p>China has enough clout to cause more pain than our economy could withstand. </p>
<p>But if the US said it was going to default on this debt it would affect the value of all outstanding treasury debt. The UST debt is the most liquid fungible commodity in the world. A default on any of it would make all of it worth less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/comment-page-1/#comment-76936</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/#comment-76936</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;James you are talking about things way above your pay grade when you say we can just not pay our debt obligations to China.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ken, you&#039;re apparently trying to read way above your own pay grade. What James said was this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;If weâ��re at war with China, I suspect weâ��ll stop payments on our debts with them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What idiot would you vote for, Ken, who would continue making debt payments to an enemy in war &lt;i&gt;during the war?&lt;/i&gt;

You simply cannot be taken seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>James you are talking about things way above your pay grade when you say we can just not pay our debt obligations to China.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ken, you're apparently trying to read way above your own pay grade. What James said was this:</p>
<blockquote><p>If weâ��re at war with China, I suspect weâ��ll stop payments on our debts with them.</p></blockquote>
<p>What idiot would you vote for, Ken, who would continue making debt payments to an enemy in war <i>during the war?</i></p>
<p>You simply cannot be taken seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/comment-page-1/#comment-76907</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/#comment-76907</guid>
		<description>James you are talking about things way above your pay grade when you say we can just not pay our debt obligations to China. 

China will just sell the debt on the open market  driving down the prices and driving up the interest rates to a point that it can destroy our economy. 

Once China starts selling, especially if it is seen as selling to gain a strategic military advantage, others will sell as well. The Euro is an alternative save haven where this money will go.  

Beside the United States is the only country in the world who has never missed a single interest or principal payment on its debt. From the federal government assuming the states revolutionary war debts, through the Civil War and the depths of the depression America has never defaulted. This is why the American dollar is the reserve currency of the world and is the benchmark against which all risk is weighed. 

What you are suggesting would destroy the value of our currency. 

You of course, not being in touch with reality, would not know any of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James you are talking about things way above your pay grade when you say we can just not pay our debt obligations to China. </p>
<p>China will just sell the debt on the open market  driving down the prices and driving up the interest rates to a point that it can destroy our economy. </p>
<p>Once China starts selling, especially if it is seen as selling to gain a strategic military advantage, others will sell as well. The Euro is an alternative save haven where this money will go.  </p>
<p>Beside the United States is the only country in the world who has never missed a single interest or principal payment on its debt. From the federal government assuming the states revolutionary war debts, through the Civil War and the depths of the depression America has never defaulted. This is why the American dollar is the reserve currency of the world and is the benchmark against which all risk is weighed. </p>
<p>What you are suggesting would destroy the value of our currency. </p>
<p>You of course, not being in touch with reality, would not know any of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/comment-page-1/#comment-76900</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/#comment-76900</guid>
		<description>...I should have said Government, not economy.  Bah.  This one issue makes me steam up more than any other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...I should have said Government, not economy.  Bah.  This one issue makes me steam up more than any other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/comment-page-1/#comment-76899</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/#comment-76899</guid>
		<description>I understand that, James. But you know that it is a bit more complicated than that.

Needless to say, and not to get sidetracked on China debts, the budget needs to be balanced asap.  Our economy cannot continue like this forever...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that, James. But you know that it is a bit more complicated than that.</p>
<p>Needless to say, and not to get sidetracked on China debts, the budget needs to be balanced asap.  Our economy cannot continue like this forever...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/comment-page-1/#comment-76895</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/#comment-76895</guid>
		<description>Jonk:  If we&#039;re at war with China, I suspect we&#039;ll stop payments on our debts with them.

We&#039;re in the middle of a major war which followed a mild recession.  It would have been foolish to try to do it on a pay as you go basis.

There are plenty of cuts to be made and maybe even some areas for increasing revenue.  But, frankly, there isn&#039;t $400 billion worth of tax hikes/spending cuts out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonk:  If we're at war with China, I suspect we'll stop payments on our debts with them.</p>
<p>We're in the middle of a major war which followed a mild recession.  It would have been foolish to try to do it on a pay as you go basis.</p>
<p>There are plenty of cuts to be made and maybe even some areas for increasing revenue.  But, frankly, there isn't $400 billion worth of tax hikes/spending cuts out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/comment-page-1/#comment-76894</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/#comment-76894</guid>
		<description>The budget needs to be balanced, period.  There is no excuse for this current situation.  This, I feel, should be the number one priority of the &#039;06 and &#039;08 elections.  If we don&#039;t fix this mess now, our &quot;investors&quot; will fix it for us...

I don&#039;t want China calling the shots, especially if they invade Taiwan and at the same time economically choke us with our own debt.  At this point, this is one war we *will* lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The budget needs to be balanced, period.  There is no excuse for this current situation.  This, I feel, should be the number one priority of the '06 and '08 elections.  If we don't fix this mess now, our "investors" will fix it for us...</p>
<p>I don't want China calling the shots, especially if they invade Taiwan and at the same time economically choke us with our own debt.  At this point, this is one war we *will* lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/comment-page-1/#comment-76893</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/#comment-76893</guid>
		<description>I can understand occassionally running a debt for investment, but the current debt is at a ridiculous level.  Right now the Republicans control all branches of government, and yet few spending cuts have made it through.  Therefore, I agree it is politically infeasible to make the cuts Sullivan talks about.  The choice seems to be large debt with tax cuts, or smaller debt without them.  I&#039;m inclined to say no tax cuts.

I believe it&#039;s possible to agree with tax cuts in principle, but to not support them because of the current situation.  Isn&#039;t that the most fiscally responsible action to take?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand occassionally running a debt for investment, but the current debt is at a ridiculous level.  Right now the Republicans control all branches of government, and yet few spending cuts have made it through.  Therefore, I agree it is politically infeasible to make the cuts Sullivan talks about.  The choice seems to be large debt with tax cuts, or smaller debt without them.  I'm inclined to say no tax cuts.</p>
<p>I believe it's possible to agree with tax cuts in principle, but to not support them because of the current situation.  Isn't that the most fiscally responsible action to take?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrGone</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/comment-page-1/#comment-76885</link>
		<dc:creator>MrGone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/#comment-76885</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a nice start:  50B from the &quot;war on drugs&quot;.  State and federal spending per year!  This is another war we lost long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a nice start:  50B from the "war on drugs".  State and federal spending per year!  This is another war we lost long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/comment-page-1/#comment-76884</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/balancing_the_federal_budget_what_to_cut/#comment-76884</guid>
		<description>T-bird,
While that stuff absolutely ought to be cut, it still won&#039;t come anywhere near to balancing the scales. The simple fact of the matter is that the tax cuts have to go. We&#039;ve known for years now that supply-side economics doesn&#039;t work - putting more money into the hands of the wealthy doesn&#039;t &#039;trickle-down&#039; to middle &amp; lower classes, it just goes directly into wealthy folks&#039; overseas bank accounts.

James is right that there will occasionally be good reasons to overspend the budget for investment purposes, but I can&#039;t think of a good way to institutionalize that other than a Soviet-style &#039;5-year plan&#039;, and I don&#039;t think anyone wants to go there... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-bird,<br />
While that stuff absolutely ought to be cut, it still won't come anywhere near to balancing the scales. The simple fact of the matter is that the tax cuts have to go. We've known for years now that supply-side economics doesn't work - putting more money into the hands of the wealthy doesn't 'trickle-down' to middle &amp; lower classes, it just goes directly into wealthy folks' overseas bank accounts.</p>
<p>James is right that there will occasionally be good reasons to overspend the budget for investment purposes, but I can't think of a good way to institutionalize that other than a Soviet-style '5-year plan', and I don't think anyone wants to go there... :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
