<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ballot Measures Defeated Nationwide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ballot_measures_defeated_nationwide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ballot_measures_defeated_nationwide/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:42:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Plunk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ballot_measures_defeated_nationwide/comment-page-1/#comment-220214</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Plunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/ballot_measures_defeated_nationwide/#comment-220214</guid>
		<description>Oregon&#039;s governor Kulongoski whines about private money but ignores the power of the state government&#039;s role in the election.  You can&#039;t forget it was the legislature, not the people, who put this on the ballot.

More than the money I believe it was the fact this was an amendment to the state constitution rather than a statutory change.  The legislature purposely made it so to avoid the 50% turnout requirement for tax increases.  They couldn&#039;t pass it themselves since they needed a super-majority.  Citizens could see this was political game playing.

The &quot;big tobacco&quot; money did little more than educate the electorate.  It did not buy the election as sleepy Ted says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oregon's governor Kulongoski whines about private money but ignores the power of the state government's role in the election.  You can't forget it was the legislature, not the people, who put this on the ballot.</p>
<p>More than the money I believe it was the fact this was an amendment to the state constitution rather than a statutory change.  The legislature purposely made it so to avoid the 50% turnout requirement for tax increases.  They couldn't pass it themselves since they needed a super-majority.  Citizens could see this was political game playing.</p>
<p>The "big tobacco" money did little more than educate the electorate.  It did not buy the election as sleepy Ted says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JammieWearingFool</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ballot_measures_defeated_nationwide/comment-page-1/#comment-220065</link>
		<dc:creator>JammieWearingFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/ballot_measures_defeated_nationwide/#comment-220065</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NJ Voters Reject Public Stem Cell Funding...&lt;/strong&gt;

Despite last-minute radio ads using stem cell mascot Michael J. Fox, the voters of New Jersey rejected by 53-47% a proposal to borrow $450 million to provide grants for research. Hopefully, this sends a message around the nation that even in a blue s.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NJ Voters Reject Public Stem Cell Funding...</strong></p>
<p>Despite last-minute radio ads using stem cell mascot Michael J. Fox, the voters of New Jersey rejected by 53-47% a proposal to borrow $450 million to provide grants for research. Hopefully, this sends a message around the nation that even in a blue s.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
