<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better Than Star Trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/better_than_star_trek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/better_than_star_trek/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:17:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/better_than_star_trek/comment-page-1/#comment-23473</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 15:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7401#comment-23473</guid>
		<description>Maybe we should ask how much good all these toys are going to do AFTER the &quot;mission&quot; has been &quot;accomplished&quot; before we blame John Kerry for voting against them.  After all, further up the blog you point out how few casualties our 21st Century forces are already sustaining.    

I think the guys and gals currently over there would prefer better body armor to predator drones at the moment, and I know the generals have constantly lamented (when not muzzled)the lack of troop numbers.  

And even on Star Trek the point of beaming down was usually not to go to war, but to explore and make peaceful contact.  A predator drone or its grandchildren really can&#039;t do that for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe we should ask how much good all these toys are going to do AFTER the "mission" has been "accomplished" before we blame John Kerry for voting against them.  After all, further up the blog you point out how few casualties our 21st Century forces are already sustaining.    </p>
<p>I think the guys and gals currently over there would prefer better body armor to predator drones at the moment, and I know the generals have constantly lamented (when not muzzled)the lack of troop numbers.  </p>
<p>And even on Star Trek the point of beaming down was usually not to go to war, but to explore and make peaceful contact.  A predator drone or its grandchildren really can't do that for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy00</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/better_than_star_trek/comment-page-1/#comment-23455</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 11:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7401#comment-23455</guid>
		<description>Heh.   I think we all know what happens when you create combat robots in Sci-Fi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.   I think we all know what happens when you create combat robots in Sci-Fi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/better_than_star_trek/comment-page-1/#comment-23408</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 18:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7401#comment-23408</guid>
		<description>Yep.  I had it NRO for &quot;New Republic Online&quot; but I don&#039;t think they actually use it that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  I had it NRO for "New Republic Online" but I don't think they actually use it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Holtsberry</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/better_than_star_trek/comment-page-1/#comment-23407</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Holtsberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 18:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7401#comment-23407</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t that be TNR next his name rather than NRO?  I don&#039;t think Easterbrook writes for NRO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn't that be TNR next his name rather than NRO?  I don't think Easterbrook writes for NRO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  » Gone Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/better_than_star_trek/comment-page-1/#comment-128133</link>
		<dc:creator> » Gone Hollywood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7401#comment-128133</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;James Doohan, Star Trek Star and D-Day Vet, Dies at 85  Card: Star Trek Was Bad Science Fiction  âStar Trekâ Bit Players Cling On  How to Save Star Trek  UPN Cancels Star Trek: Enterprise  Jolene Blalock Playboy Interview  Better Than Star Trek  &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->James Doohan, Star Trek Star and D-Day Vet, Dies at 85  Card: Star Trek Was Bad Science Fiction  âStar Trekâ Bit Players Cling On  How to Save Star Trek  UPN Cancels Star Trek: Enterprise  Jolene Blalock Playboy Interview  Better Than Star Trek  <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
