<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BLAIR IN TROUBLE?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blair_in_trouble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blair_in_trouble/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:13:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian S.</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blair_in_trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-3920</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2736#comment-3920</guid>
		<description>I think the scandal is probably more likely to hurt the BBC the way things stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the scandal is probably more likely to hurt the BBC the way things stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristopher</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blair_in_trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-3921</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2736#comment-3921</guid>
		<description>They won&#039;t run against him because he pushed for war. They&#039;ll run against him on the &quot;lies and deceit&quot;. And look what could happen to Gray Davis when no strong opponent has yet emerged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They won't run against him because he pushed for war. They'll run against him on the "lies and deceit". And look what could happen to Gray Davis when no strong opponent has yet emerged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blair_in_trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-3922</link>
		<dc:creator>kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2736#comment-3922</guid>
		<description>Labour don&#039;t have to risk a confidence vote to drop blair. It could be done in one of 2 ways, 

1. The cabinet tell him his time is up. He wouldn&#039;t have to quit at this point but he would be dead in the water when the next step was taken.

2. The National Comittee calls a special conference to vote on a leadership vote. If they did it could only mean that the party was solidly against blair and it would be almost impossible for him to win.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour don't have to risk a confidence vote to drop blair. It could be done in one of 2 ways, </p>
<p>1. The cabinet tell him his time is up. He wouldn't have to quit at this point but he would be dead in the water when the next step was taken.</p>
<p>2. The National Comittee calls a special conference to vote on a leadership vote. If they did it could only mean that the party was solidly against blair and it would be almost impossible for him to win.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
