<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogAds Revenue Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blogads_revenue_analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blogads_revenue_analysis/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:28:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dean's World</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blogads_revenue_analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-65429</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean's World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12723#comment-65429</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What Obession Looks Like&lt;/strong&gt;

James Joyner notes a study which says that leftish blogs pull in more ad revenue than rightish blogs.

I said most of this in James&#039; comments, but it bears repe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What Obession Looks Like</strong></p>
<p>James Joyner notes a study which says that leftish blogs pull in more ad revenue than rightish blogs.</p>
<p>I said most of this in James' comments, but it bears repe...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blogads_revenue_analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-65370</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12723#comment-65370</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BlogAds Study&lt;/strong&gt;

Starling Hunter has posted his study of BlogAds revenue. Via Outside the Beltway. His conclusions: (1) the number of weekly page views (WPV) is a much stronger predictor of weekly ad revenue and price than are either the number of inbound links or the ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BlogAds Study</strong></p>
<p>Starling Hunter has posted his study of BlogAds revenue. Via Outside the Beltway. His conclusions: (1) the number of weekly page views (WPV) is a much stronger predictor of weekly ad revenue and price than are either the number of inbound links or the ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Esmay</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blogads_revenue_analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-65268</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Esmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12723#comment-65268</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re better networked because they&#039;re a smaller group. Studies of lefty blog linking habits have shown that they don&#039;t link each other near as often as righty/center right/libertarinoids do. Better networking is not their advantage per se.

The real reason they do better should be obvious: it&#039;s who controls the White House and, to a much lesser extent the Congress, that will matter most of all here.

Let a Democrat take the White House in 2008, and you will see a surge in right-wing ad buys and interest. Do you really think Drudge would be anybody today if it weren&#039;t for Clinton? 

If you want to see what&#039;s going on in a microcosm here, read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200111/york&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Life and Death of the American Spectator&lt;/a&gt; by Byron York. The whole thing is interesting from start to finish, but notice something you&#039;ll find here: the small network of fanatically rabid and often irrational partisans, working outside the beltway, feeding insatiably on anything that remotely hinted of scandals. The breathless belief that the administration was the most dishonest, slimy, and dirty one in history, bringing the nation to the brink of totalitarian collapse. The multimillionaire financiers. 

How is that different from today, except that the faces and names have changed, and the internet makes the networking easier and the batty people more able than ever to reinforce each other and egg each other on and give each other money in order to save the world from the evil one in the White House?

What I hope is that after another ten years or so of this, where we see it with one or two other administrations, with hopefully a few changes of power, most people will start to notice what really goes on with this stuff.

But then, maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They're better networked because they're a smaller group. Studies of lefty blog linking habits have shown that they don't link each other near as often as righty/center right/libertarinoids do. Better networking is not their advantage per se.</p>
<p>The real reason they do better should be obvious: it's who controls the White House and, to a much lesser extent the Congress, that will matter most of all here.</p>
<p>Let a Democrat take the White House in 2008, and you will see a surge in right-wing ad buys and interest. Do you really think Drudge would be anybody today if it weren't for Clinton? </p>
<p>If you want to see what's going on in a microcosm here, read <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200111/york" rel="nofollow">The Life and Death of the American Spectator</a> by Byron York. The whole thing is interesting from start to finish, but notice something you'll find here: the small network of fanatically rabid and often irrational partisans, working outside the beltway, feeding insatiably on anything that remotely hinted of scandals. The breathless belief that the administration was the most dishonest, slimy, and dirty one in history, bringing the nation to the brink of totalitarian collapse. The multimillionaire financiers. </p>
<p>How is that different from today, except that the faces and names have changed, and the internet makes the networking easier and the batty people more able than ever to reinforce each other and egg each other on and give each other money in order to save the world from the evil one in the White House?</p>
<p>What I hope is that after another ten years or so of this, where we see it with one or two other administrations, with hopefully a few changes of power, most people will start to notice what really goes on with this stuff.</p>
<p>But then, maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  Seeking Revenue</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blogads_revenue_analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-126365</link>
		<dc:creator> Seeking Revenue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12723#comment-126365</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;mention a few programs including Adsense and Blogads. According to him, Blogads is a proven performer. As mentioned by Mindblog, a lot of political blogs utilize BlogAds.Outside The Beltway is one such political blog which uses Blogads and provided arevenue analysis. Since I do not have as much traffic is not a political site, should I go for Blogads?&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->mention a few programs including Adsense and Blogads. According to him, Blogads is a proven performer. As mentioned by Mindblog, a lot of political blogs utilize BlogAds.Outside The Beltway is one such political blog which uses Blogads and provided arevenue analysis. Since I do not have as much traffic is not a political site, should I go for Blogads?<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
