<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogger Faces Lawsuit Over Reader Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blogger_faces_lawsuit_over_reader_comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blogger_faces_lawsuit_over_reader_comments/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:01:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blogger_faces_lawsuit_over_reader_comments/comment-page-1/#comment-56207</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 01:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11833#comment-56207</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Earlier this year, Apple Computer Inc. sued a Harvard student in a California court, accusing him of publishing trade secrets on his blog, ThinkSecret.com, in violation of state law. That case is pending in Superior Court in Santa Clara, Calif&lt;/em&gt;

The case is, IIRC, being &lt;em&gt;appealed&lt;/em&gt; to calif. superior court, because the blogger lost, which was big news at the time. I suspect this Search Engine Optimization company (about one step above spammers IMHO) is going to use the same tactic. 

Thanks, apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Earlier this year, Apple Computer Inc. sued a Harvard student in a California court, accusing him of publishing trade secrets on his blog, ThinkSecret.com, in violation of state law. That case is pending in Superior Court in Santa Clara, Calif</em></p>
<p>The case is, IIRC, being <em>appealed</em> to calif. superior court, because the blogger lost, which was big news at the time. I suspect this Search Engine Optimization company (about one step above spammers IMHO) is going to use the same tactic. </p>
<p>Thanks, apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NIF</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/blogger_faces_lawsuit_over_reader_comments/comment-page-1/#comment-56196</link>
		<dc:creator>NIF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11833#comment-56196</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;First the spankings&lt;/strong&gt;

Today&#039;s dose of NIF - News, Interesting &amp; Funny ... It&#039;s a no-cause Wednesday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>First the spankings</strong></p>
<p>Today's dose of NIF - News, Interesting &amp; Funny ... It's a no-cause Wednesday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
