<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex Retalliation Cases Allowed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bloombergcom_us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bloombergcom_us/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:30:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Just Me</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bloombergcom_us/comment-page-1/#comment-40789</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9831#comment-40789</guid>
		<description>Sounds like finding something in the law that wasn&#039;t.

Also, you would think there would be other ways he could seek relief-wrongful termination, maybe under the whistleblower law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like finding something in the law that wasn't.</p>
<p>Also, you would think there would be other ways he could seek relief-wrongful termination, maybe under the whistleblower law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denise</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bloombergcom_us/comment-page-1/#comment-40766</link>
		<dc:creator>denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9831#comment-40766</guid>
		<description>James -- I&#039;m not sure he would have a wrongful discharge claim under state law.  He might, but it&#039;s not necessarily the case.

Also, I&#039;m pretty sure that under Title IX the court can award attorney fees to the prevailing party.  I would guess that does not happen under Alabama state law.  Again, just a guess.

Finally, this is probably a case where a plaintiff would rather be in federal court than in the local district court.  Since there would be no diversity of citizenship, the only way to get into federal court is to have a federal cause of action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James -- I'm not sure he would have a wrongful discharge claim under state law.  He might, but it's not necessarily the case.</p>
<p>Also, I'm pretty sure that under Title IX the court can award attorney fees to the prevailing party.  I would guess that does not happen under Alabama state law.  Again, just a guess.</p>
<p>Finally, this is probably a case where a plaintiff would rather be in federal court than in the local district court.  Since there would be no diversity of citizenship, the only way to get into federal court is to have a federal cause of action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bloombergcom_us/comment-page-1/#comment-40753</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9831#comment-40753</guid>
		<description>Alex,

Gotcha.  It&#039;s not clear to me why he needed to sue under Title IX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>
<p>Gotcha.  It's not clear to me why he needed to sue under Title IX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/bloombergcom_us/comment-page-1/#comment-40752</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9831#comment-40752</guid>
		<description>The legal issue from this case stemmed from the fact that the coach, who is male, was not actually being discriminated against.  So the legal issue was whether the coach had standing to sue under the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The legal issue from this case stemmed from the fact that the coach, who is male, was not actually being discriminated against.  So the legal issue was whether the coach had standing to sue under the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
